Amazon Sued for Inflating Prices, Penalizing Merchants for Offering Lower Prices on Rival Sites

E-commerce giant Amazon was slapped with a lawsuit from the state of California on Wednesday, over allegedly violating anti-trust laws by penalizing third-party merchants for selling their products at lower prices on competing websites.

According to the Wall Street Journal which obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Attorney General Rob Bonta alleged Amazon forces third-party merchants into agreements penalizing them in the event they offer products at reduced prices on rival sites such as Target or Walmart. For those sellers failing to comply, the e-commerce giant deliberately places their products lower in search results, sometimes removes them from the site’s “buy box,” or eliminates the products entirely.

Likewise, the complaint also accuses Amazon of coercing wholesalers into similar agreements where they face penalties in the event Amazon cuts prices to match competitors and profit margins slip below a certain threshold. In fact, wholesalers are sometimes forced to compensate the e-commerce company if rival online retailers reduce their products’ prices. And, given Amazon’s strong oligopolistic dominance in the space, the third-party merchants and wholesalers are often left with no choice but to comply with the demands.

“Amazon coerces merchants into agreements that keep prices artificially high, knowing full-well that they can’t afford to say no,” said Bonta. “Many of the products we buy online would be cheaper if market forces were left unconstrained.” California, which is home to the largest population and economy, strongly influences how major companies conduct their operations in the US. The suit is requesting the court to bar Amazon from continuing the anti-competition practices, and appoint a watchdog to ensure the company complies. In addition, California is also pursuing damages caused to the state’s economy, as well as $2,500 for every account the court proves Amazon violated California’s civil and professional code.

Information for this briefing was found via the WSJ. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Is Altamira Gold Sitting On Brazil’s Next Big Gold Discovery?

Coeur Mining: The $7 Billion Acquisition Of New Gold

Fresnillo Steps Out Of Mexico With $780 Million Probe Gold Buyout

Recommended

Stifel Initiates Coverage On Goliath Resources With $5.00 Price Target

ESGold Completes Mill Building Construction, Final Equipment Procurement Underway

Related News

California Leases Its Last Nuclear Plant A New Five-Year Life

As the state face potential power shortages due to high demand from the grid, California...

Friday, September 2, 2022, 10:59:00 AM

Amazon Upsizes Bond Offering to $18.5 Billion in New Debt Sale It Doesn’t Actually Need

It appears that the historically cheap borrowing costs of the Covid-19 era were too good...

Tuesday, May 11, 2021, 11:17:00 AM

Tech Names Top Layoffs In Past Year As Job Cuts Continue

Tech names are leading the pack of companies who have had massive layoffs in the...

Wednesday, January 18, 2023, 03:01:00 PM

Amazon Slides Down 9% After Lackluster Q1 2022 Financials, First Net Loss In 7 Years

Amazon.com, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) reported on Thursday post-closing its financial results for Q1 2022. The...

Friday, April 29, 2022, 10:12:00 AM

Tesla Executives Knew Robotaxi Claims Were Overstated, Documents Show

Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) executives privately acknowledged to California regulators that their vehicles lack true autonomous...

Tuesday, August 5, 2025, 11:17:00 AM