Amazon Sued for Inflating Prices, Penalizing Merchants for Offering Lower Prices on Rival Sites

E-commerce giant Amazon was slapped with a lawsuit from the state of California on Wednesday, over allegedly violating anti-trust laws by penalizing third-party merchants for selling their products at lower prices on competing websites.

According to the Wall Street Journal which obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Attorney General Rob Bonta alleged Amazon forces third-party merchants into agreements penalizing them in the event they offer products at reduced prices on rival sites such as Target or Walmart. For those sellers failing to comply, the e-commerce giant deliberately places their products lower in search results, sometimes removes them from the site’s “buy box,” or eliminates the products entirely.

Likewise, the complaint also accuses Amazon of coercing wholesalers into similar agreements where they face penalties in the event Amazon cuts prices to match competitors and profit margins slip below a certain threshold. In fact, wholesalers are sometimes forced to compensate the e-commerce company if rival online retailers reduce their products’ prices. And, given Amazon’s strong oligopolistic dominance in the space, the third-party merchants and wholesalers are often left with no choice but to comply with the demands.

“Amazon coerces merchants into agreements that keep prices artificially high, knowing full-well that they can’t afford to say no,” said Bonta. “Many of the products we buy online would be cheaper if market forces were left unconstrained.” California, which is home to the largest population and economy, strongly influences how major companies conduct their operations in the US. The suit is requesting the court to bar Amazon from continuing the anti-competition practices, and appoint a watchdog to ensure the company complies. In addition, California is also pursuing damages caused to the state’s economy, as well as $2,500 for every account the court proves Amazon violated California’s civil and professional code.

Information for this briefing was found via the WSJ. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Goliath Resources Hits 10.60 g/t Gold Over 22.82 Metres, Highest Grade Results In Third Distinct Rock Package At Surebet Discovery

Four Countries Control the Fertilizer That Feeds the World | Sage Potash

$10,000 Gold Is Just A Question of Time | Florian Grummes

Recommended

Antimony Resources Drills 5.27% Sb Over 4.95 Metres In Latest Results

Nord Precious Metals Identifies 29 Veins At Castle East Following 3D Modeling

Related News

Another California Refinery Closure Looms Amid Regulatory Pressures

Valero Refining (NYSE: VLO) has notified California regulators of its intention to possibly idle, restructure,...

Thursday, April 17, 2025, 11:24:00 AM

Newsom’s Veto Blocks Undocumented Immigrants from State Home Loan Program

California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed Assembly Bill 1840, which aimed to expand the California...

Monday, September 9, 2024, 09:30:00 AM

Goodbye Discretionary Spending: Evidence of an Economic Slowdown From Walmart, Apple, and Amazon

It’s no secret that the days of discretionary spending are over. With consecutive declines in...

Friday, January 6, 2023, 06:26:00 AM

California Will Require All New Vehicles to be Zero-Emission by 2035

It appears that Tesla’s latest move towards vertical integration and increased mass production of its...

Thursday, September 24, 2020, 10:36:00 AM

Allstate to Hike California Home Insurance Rates by 34%, Largest Increase in Three Years

Allstate Corp. (NYSE: ALL) has announced plans to raise home insurance rates for its customers...

Saturday, August 31, 2024, 11:24:00 AM