Amazon Sued for Inflating Prices, Penalizing Merchants for Offering Lower Prices on Rival Sites

E-commerce giant Amazon was slapped with a lawsuit from the state of California on Wednesday, over allegedly violating anti-trust laws by penalizing third-party merchants for selling their products at lower prices on competing websites.

According to the Wall Street Journal which obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Attorney General Rob Bonta alleged Amazon forces third-party merchants into agreements penalizing them in the event they offer products at reduced prices on rival sites such as Target or Walmart. For those sellers failing to comply, the e-commerce giant deliberately places their products lower in search results, sometimes removes them from the site’s “buy box,” or eliminates the products entirely.

Likewise, the complaint also accuses Amazon of coercing wholesalers into similar agreements where they face penalties in the event Amazon cuts prices to match competitors and profit margins slip below a certain threshold. In fact, wholesalers are sometimes forced to compensate the e-commerce company if rival online retailers reduce their products’ prices. And, given Amazon’s strong oligopolistic dominance in the space, the third-party merchants and wholesalers are often left with no choice but to comply with the demands.

“Amazon coerces merchants into agreements that keep prices artificially high, knowing full-well that they can’t afford to say no,” said Bonta. “Many of the products we buy online would be cheaper if market forces were left unconstrained.” California, which is home to the largest population and economy, strongly influences how major companies conduct their operations in the US. The suit is requesting the court to bar Amazon from continuing the anti-competition practices, and appoint a watchdog to ensure the company complies. In addition, California is also pursuing damages caused to the state’s economy, as well as $2,500 for every account the court proves Amazon violated California’s civil and professional code.

Information for this briefing was found via the WSJ. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why Silver Needs to Slow Down to Go Higher | Dan Dickson – Endeavour Silver

Silver Dips Are Getting Bought, This Is How Breakouts Start | John Feneck

Why $100 Silver Right Now Would Be a Problem | Keith Neumeyer – First Majestic

Recommended

NexGen Launches 42,000 Metre Drill Program At PCE While Expanding Mineralized Footprint

First Majestic Hits 2025 Guidance, Producing 31.1 Million Silver Equivalent Ounces, Increases Dividend

Related News

Not a ‘Skittles ban’: California Sets Precedent with Ban on Four Common Food Additives

California has become the first state in the United States to enact a comprehensive ban...

Wednesday, October 11, 2023, 03:39:00 PM

California Fines Tesla $38K For Employee Stuck In Model Y On A Conveyor Belt

Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is under scrutiny by the California Division of Occupational Safety and...

Friday, December 8, 2023, 09:55:29 AM

California Governor Gavin Newsom Wants Constitutional Amendment for Gun Control

California Governor Gavin Newsom is pushing for a 28th amendment to the United States Constitution...

Friday, June 9, 2023, 04:20:00 PM

Amazon Shares Jump After Announcing 20-For-1 Stock Split, US$10 Billion Share Buyback

Amazon.com, Inc. (Nasdaq: AMZN) announced that its board approved on Wednesday a 20-for-1 split for...

Thursday, March 10, 2022, 11:10:00 AM

Tesla Executives Knew Robotaxi Claims Were Overstated, Documents Show

Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) executives privately acknowledged to California regulators that their vehicles lack true autonomous...

Tuesday, August 5, 2025, 11:17:00 AM