Major news agencies have raised concerns over the authenticity of the latest official portrait featuring Kate Middleton and her three children. The Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, and Reuters have issued kill notifications to media outlets, stating they will no longer distribute the image released by Kensington Palace on Sunday.
I suspect this was not the headline Kensington Palace was hoping to get from the normally supportive @Telegraph on Monday morning:
— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 10, 2024
“Photo from Palace was doctored, say agencies”. pic.twitter.com/W7JxIgdlQA
The Associated Press cited apparent manipulation of the image as the reason for withdrawing it from circulation. Agence France-Presse referred to an “editorial issue,” while Reuters mentioned conducting a “post-publication review” that led to the photo’s withdrawal.
PR disaster so far. Royal Family wanted to lessen the speculation, of which most people would have actually been unaware. They’ve amplified it. Kensington Palace is going to have to explain what’s happened and quickly to avoid the story getting further out of control. https://t.co/Oqx3Hvz9wA
— Lewis Goodall (@lewis_goodall) March 10, 2024
The portrait, taken by Prince William according to the BBC, depicts Kate Middleton posing with Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis. It marked the first official photograph released of the Princess of Wales since her last public appearance on Christmas Day.
Middleton has maintained a low profile in recent months, with only a single paparazzi photo surfacing in March, as reported by TMZ. The palace had previously announced her planned abdominal surgery in January and dismissed claims of her being in a coma.
The princess’s prolonged absence from the public eye fueled speculation and conspiracy theories, which the latest portrait failed to quell entirely. Social media users scrutinized the image, questioning whether it had been photoshopped or generated using artificial intelligence.
I wasn’t in on this whole conspiracy about Kate Middleton missing and the royals covering it up until they dropped this obviously fake photo today to appease public concern.
— Jon | Mark (@NerdyTeacher_) March 10, 2024
I do photography, and work with post processing/editing a lot … here are just a few unexplainable issues pic.twitter.com/O0NBUpIYru
Specific points of contention included the seemingly disappearing cuff of Princess Charlotte’s pink cardigan and Kate Middleton’s absence of her wedding ring in the photograph. An X user also pointed out the leaves on the trees despite it being early March.
no rings, kids all have their fingers crossed, weird blurring on charlotte’s cuffs, leaves on the trees despite it being early mach – i’m sorry but they’re just asking for us to go full katespiracy at this point https://t.co/v7Eh7iQT9x
— Ben Smoke (@bencsmoke) March 10, 2024
The Associated Press further noted an “inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte’s left hand” as evidence of potential manipulation.
I’ve never been much of a conspiracy theorist but if @AP @AFP @Reuters & other picture agencies are concerned enough to remove it and ask clients to delete it, there are serious questions for Kensington Palace – which was the source of the photo.
— Chris Ship (@chrisshipitv) March 10, 2024
These appears to be the issues 👇 https://t.co/ifcSB9mUzu pic.twitter.com/bH5gN9fJtJ
On Monday morning, an explanation, signed “C” for Catherine, was posted on the Prince and Princess of Wales’s X account.
Like many amateur photographers, I do occasionally experiment with editing. I wanted to express my apologies for any confusion the family photograph we shared yesterday caused. I hope everyone celebrating had a very happy Mother’s Day. C
— The Prince and Princess of Wales (@KensingtonRoyal) March 11, 2024
But does it really explain anything?
The Palace release new undoctored photo of a happy Kate and William to calm all the controversy.#KateMiddleton pic.twitter.com/q1xrTTJhYx
— Hopeless Semantic (@JimBlower) March 10, 2024
Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.