Apple And Its $14 Billion Problem

A European tribunal is being urged to reevaluate its decision in favor of Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) regarding a $14 billion tax order, according to an adviser to Europe’s top court. The tax case, a part of EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager’s efforts to address deals between multinationals and EU countries seen as unfair state aid, stems from a 2016 decision by the European Commission. The commission asserted that Apple had benefited from two Irish tax rulings for over two decades, artificially reducing its tax burden to as low as 0.005% in 2014.

In 2020, the European Union’s General Court upheld Apple’s challenge, stating that regulators had failed to meet the legal standard demonstrating an unfair advantage. However, Advocate General Giovanni Pitruzzella at the European Court of Justice (ECJ) disagreed, suggesting that the General Court’s judgment should be set aside, citing legal errors.

“The judgment of the General Court on ‘tax rulings’ adopted by Ireland in relation to Apple should be set aside,” Pitruzzella said in a non-binding opinion, pointing out a series of legal errors and the failure to assess certain methodological errors according to the Commission’s decision. He emphasized the need for the General Court to conduct a new assessment.

The ECJ, expected to rule in the coming months, generally follows about four in five such recommendations.

Ireland maintained its stance that it had not provided any state aid to Apple. Michael McGrath, Ireland’s finance minister, clarified, “It is important to bear in mind that this opinion does not form part of the Court of Justice of the European Union judgment but is considered by the Court when arriving at its final ruling. It has always been, and remains, Ireland’s position that the correct amount of Irish tax was paid and that Ireland provided no state aid to Apple.”

Despite appeals by Apple and Dublin against the tax order, Apple had already handed over the full amount, held in an escrow account by Ireland.

“We thank the court for its time and ongoing consideration in this case. The General Court’s ruling was very clear that Apple received no selective advantage and no state aid, and we believe that should be upheld,” stated an Apple spokesperson.


Information for this briefing was found via Reuters, CNN, and the sources mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Leave a Reply

Video Articles

Endeavour Mining Q1 Earnings: Cash Flow Is King

G Mining Oko West Feasibility: Move Fast, Break.. Nothing?

New Gold Q1 Earnings: What’s Behind The Market’s Surprising Reaction?

Recommended

Giant Mining Encounters Native Copper As Hole MHB-34 Hits 563 Metres Depth

Verses Hits Commercialization Stage With Genius AI Platform

Related News

China’s Silicon Valley On COVID Lockdown, Apple Supplier Shuts Down

China has placed Shenzhen city and the province of Jilin under strict lockdown following the...

Monday, March 14, 2022, 10:02:00 AM

Former Apple Employee’s Revelations On Hazardous Waste Violations Lead to Major EPA Investigation

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified at least 19 potential violations of the...

Tuesday, June 25, 2024, 02:04:00 PM

Apple Plans to Move 20% of Production from China to India in Response to Coronavirus Chaos

As the coronavirus pandemic continues to wreak havoc around the world, several large companies are...

Wednesday, May 13, 2020, 12:02:00 PM

Apple Ends Partnership With Goldman Sachs

Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) is discontinuing its credit-card partnership with Goldman Sachs, signaling the conclusion of...

Wednesday, November 29, 2023, 07:44:06 AM

Apple Enters EV Market with Self-Driving Car, Breakthrough Battery Technology by 2024

It appears that Tesla has been dealt yet another blow following its not-so prosperous acclaim...

Saturday, December 26, 2020, 11:46:00 AM