Queensland’s New ‘Unworkable’ Land Tax May Not Be Such A Bad Thing For Renters

Being a landlord in Queensland could soon be more trouble than it’s worth, thanks to the new land tax that will be implemented beginning June 30 next year.

The new rule only affects property investors who have land in Queensland and interstate. It requires anyone who owns investment properties interstate and in Queensland to pay taxes computed against the total taxable value of their investment land in Queensland and the statutory value of their interstate land. 

As an example, an individual investor who owns land in Queensland worth AU$745,000 in taxable value will only be charged $1,950 in land tax before June 30, regardless of the value of their other interstate land. But, when the new rule is implemented, the same individual investor, who also owns interstate land valued at $1,565,000 will now have to pay $8,422 in land tax.

Industry groups say that this change in the state’s land tax is causing property investors to consider selling their property — with some already selling up, or worse, passing on the additional cost to their tenants.

Other experts say that the reform, which the state government has called “prudent,” would rebalance an overheated property market that leans towards investors over owner-occupiers and renters.

Matt Grudnoff, a senior economist at The Australia Institute, said that the aim of the land tax reform is to create less favorable conditions for property investors.

“At the moment in Australia we give enormous tax concessions to people who invest in property,” Grudnoff said. “This has left a distortion in the property market, which has led to overinvestment and higher prices.”

“If the state government taxes that and stops some of that distortion and brings it back to some sort of level playing field between owner-occupiers and investors then it’s only a good thing.”

Grudnoff emphasized that property investors would not be able to pass the entirety of the additional cost to their tenants because there’s a limit to what tenants can afford to pay. It could be a win-win type of situation where landlords are better off selling their property, and tenants get the opportunity to buy a home.


Information for this briefing was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

The Hidden Environmental Cost of Fertilizer | Robin Dow

Could Silver Stay This High? | Joaquín Marias – Argenta Silver

Can Historic Silver Data Turn Into a New Mine? | Rob Macdonald – Equity Metals

Recommended

First Majestic Drills 3.43 g/t Gold Over 24.4 Metres At Jerritt Canyon

Goliath Resources Secures 100% Ownership of Golddigger Property in BC’s Golden Triangle

Related News

Does the Australian Prime Minister Want to Ban Memes?

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese faced criticism after his recent comments seemed to equate humorous...

Friday, April 26, 2024, 02:21:00 PM

Australia’s Inflation Soars to 30 Year-High as Food and Energy Costs Skyrocket

Australian consumer prices soared by the most in over three decades as food and energy...

Sunday, October 30, 2022, 11:19:00 AM

Quantitative Peopling: Population Growth Masking Economic Challenges in Canada and Australia

Recent data reveals that Canada and Australia are experiencing record population growth, primarily driven by...

Tuesday, August 27, 2024, 02:02:00 PM

Supreme Cannabis Expands International Shipments To Australia, Minimal Details Provided

Supreme Cannabis (TSX: FIRE) this morning proudly announced that it has completed its first shipment...

Friday, January 8, 2021, 08:27:53 AM

Australia Proposes Ban on Social Media for Under-16s

Australia has unveiled plans for legislation that would block social media access for children under...

Saturday, November 9, 2024, 09:33:00 AM