Serbia Ends 35-Year Nuclear Power Ban for Energy Transition

Serbia’s parliament has voted to end its long-standing moratorium on nuclear power development. The decision, announced by Energy Minister Dubravka Djedovic Handanovic, overturns restrictions that had been in place since the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

The ban was originally implemented by former Yugoslavia, which had suspended its nuclear program and shut down its sole research reactor near Belgrade. This latest move comes as Serbia faces pressure to decarbonize its energy sector, particularly with the European Union’s 2050 deadline to phase out coal power.

Currently, Serbia heavily depends on coal for its energy needs, contributing to severe air pollution that has made its capital, Belgrade, one of the most polluted cities during winter months. However, the transition to nuclear power is expected to be a complex undertaking. According to a recent government study, establishing a new nuclear facility could take up to two decades.

Selkirk Copper Mines — sponsored Sponsored · Selkirk Copper Mines

In March, President Aleksandar Vučić announced at the Nuclear Energy Summit in Brussels the country’s plans to develop 1.2GW of nuclear capacity using small modular reactors. The ambitious project faces several challenges, including an estimated €8 billion price tag and the need for international support.

“Today it is important that we understand how far behind we are and how we made wrong decisions in the previous 35 and 40 years. The importance attached to this summit indicates to us how much electricity we will lack in the future. To simplify, without nuclear energy we will not be able to survive the arrival of artificial intelligence or electric cars,” he said at the Nuclear Energy Summit.

Currently, Serbia heavily depends on coal for its energy needs, contributing to severe air pollution in Belgrade. While the country faces EU pressure to phase out coal by 2050, the transition to nuclear power is expected to be complex. Government studies suggest establishing new nuclear facilities could take up to two decades.


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Red Cloud Fall Mining Showcase 2026 | Day 2

More Gold Without a Bigger Upfront Bill? | Keith Boyle – New Found Gold

The Red Cloud Fall Mining Showcase 2026 | Day 1

Recommended

First Majestic Lifts Q3 Revenue 38% to US$394.1 Million on Higher Silver Prices

Meghan Markle’s Half-Brother Submitted Evidence Against Their Father, But Now Faces Philippine Police Scrutiny

Related News

Ontario Power Generation Signs Deal for What Could Become World’s Largest Nuclear Station

Ontario Power Generation secured an agreement Thursday to build what officials describe as a potential...

Friday, February 13, 2026, 03:10:00 PM

New York Bets On First Big US Reactor Push in a Generation

New York Governor Kathy Hochul has ordered the New York Power Authority to develop at...

Thursday, June 26, 2025, 07:31:00 AM

Denmark Rethinking 4-Decade Nuclear Ban Amid Green Transition Push

Denmark’s government is analyzing whether to end its 40-year ban on nuclear power, marking a...

Saturday, May 17, 2025, 07:32:00 AM

Germany Will Have No Choice But To Allow Russian Uranium Shipment

The German government’s hands are tied and it has no choice but to permit the...

Wednesday, September 14, 2022, 12:51:00 PM

Rosatom Wins Lead Role in $16.5B Kazakhstan Balkhash Plant

Russia and Kazakhstan inked a $16.5 billion agreement Thursday to build Central Asia’s first nuclear...

Thursday, May 28, 2026, 11:58:57 AM