Serbia Ends 35-Year Nuclear Power Ban for Energy Transition

Serbia’s parliament has voted to end its long-standing moratorium on nuclear power development. The decision, announced by Energy Minister Dubravka Djedovic Handanovic, overturns restrictions that had been in place since the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

The ban was originally implemented by former Yugoslavia, which had suspended its nuclear program and shut down its sole research reactor near Belgrade. This latest move comes as Serbia faces pressure to decarbonize its energy sector, particularly with the European Union’s 2050 deadline to phase out coal power.

Currently, Serbia heavily depends on coal for its energy needs, contributing to severe air pollution that has made its capital, Belgrade, one of the most polluted cities during winter months. However, the transition to nuclear power is expected to be a complex undertaking. According to a recent government study, establishing a new nuclear facility could take up to two decades.

Altamira Gold Corp. — sponsored Sponsored · Altamira Gold Corp.

In March, President Aleksandar Vučić announced at the Nuclear Energy Summit in Brussels the country’s plans to develop 1.2GW of nuclear capacity using small modular reactors. The ambitious project faces several challenges, including an estimated €8 billion price tag and the need for international support.

“Today it is important that we understand how far behind we are and how we made wrong decisions in the previous 35 and 40 years. The importance attached to this summit indicates to us how much electricity we will lack in the future. To simplify, without nuclear energy we will not be able to survive the arrival of artificial intelligence or electric cars,” he said at the Nuclear Energy Summit.

Currently, Serbia heavily depends on coal for its energy needs, contributing to severe air pollution in Belgrade. While the country faces EU pressure to phase out coal by 2050, the transition to nuclear power is expected to be complex. Government studies suggest establishing new nuclear facilities could take up to two decades.


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Mining Stock Mailbag: Hycroft, Vizsla, K92, Goliath & More | Oct. 5-9, 2026

Why Investors Are Returning To Mining Stocks | Rob McLeod – Cambria Gold Mines

How This Gold Stock Delivered a 32X Return | Martino De Ciccio – Montage Gold

Recommended

First Majestic Produces 3.4 Million Ounces of Silver in Q3 2026, Jerritt Canyon Restart Remains on Track

Altamira Gold Drills 134 Metres of 0.5 g/t Gold at Maria Bonita, Hole Ends in Mineralization

Related News

US to Invest $3.4 Billion in Domestic Nuclear Reactor Fuel Production

The United States government is set to request bids from suppliers for contracts worth up...

Tuesday, May 21, 2024, 10:51:01 AM

Saskatchewan Moves to Support Nuclear with Carbon Tax Changes

In a strategic move to bolster its clean electricity transition efforts, the Saskatchewan government has...

Tuesday, December 5, 2023, 09:47:26 AM

Senate Passes ADVANCE Act, Allowing Biden to Sanction Rosatom

The US Senate has approved the ADVANCE Act, a comprehensive clean energy bill aimed at...

Wednesday, June 19, 2024, 11:27:00 AM

Under Merz, Germany Softens Nuclear Stance in EU Talks

Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s government is easing Germany’s stance against nuclear energy in European Union policy...

Tuesday, May 20, 2025, 02:56:00 PM

China Greenlights Record 11 Nuclear Reactors in Major Energy Push

China has approved the construction of 11 new nuclear reactors across five different sites. This...

Tuesday, August 20, 2024, 08:03:30 AM