Serbia Ends 35-Year Nuclear Power Ban for Energy Transition

Serbia’s parliament has voted to end its long-standing moratorium on nuclear power development. The decision, announced by Energy Minister Dubravka Djedovic Handanovic, overturns restrictions that had been in place since the aftermath of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster.

The ban was originally implemented by former Yugoslavia, which had suspended its nuclear program and shut down its sole research reactor near Belgrade. This latest move comes as Serbia faces pressure to decarbonize its energy sector, particularly with the European Union’s 2050 deadline to phase out coal power.

Currently, Serbia heavily depends on coal for its energy needs, contributing to severe air pollution that has made its capital, Belgrade, one of the most polluted cities during winter months. However, the transition to nuclear power is expected to be a complex undertaking. According to a recent government study, establishing a new nuclear facility could take up to two decades.

Silver47 Exploration Inc. — sponsored Sponsored · Silver47 Exploration Inc.

In March, President Aleksandar Vučić announced at the Nuclear Energy Summit in Brussels the country’s plans to develop 1.2GW of nuclear capacity using small modular reactors. The ambitious project faces several challenges, including an estimated €8 billion price tag and the need for international support.

“Today it is important that we understand how far behind we are and how we made wrong decisions in the previous 35 and 40 years. The importance attached to this summit indicates to us how much electricity we will lack in the future. To simplify, without nuclear energy we will not be able to survive the arrival of artificial intelligence or electric cars,” he said at the Nuclear Energy Summit.

Currently, Serbia heavily depends on coal for its energy needs, contributing to severe air pollution in Belgrade. While the country faces EU pressure to phase out coal by 2050, the transition to nuclear power is expected to be complex. Government studies suggest establishing new nuclear facilities could take up to two decades.


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why Investors Are Returning To Mining Stocks | Rob McLeod – Cambria Gold Mines

How This Gold Stock Delivered a 32X Return | Martino De Ciccio – Montage Gold

America Can’t Stop Printing Money, What Happens to Gold? | Rod Husband – Epic Gold

Recommended

First Majestic Produces 3.4 Million Ounces of Silver in Q3 2026, Jerritt Canyon Restart Remains on Track

Altamira Gold Drills 134 Metres of 0.5 g/t Gold at Maria Bonita, Hole Ends in Mineralization

Related News

New York to Build First Nuclear Plant in Decades

New York Governor Kathy Hochul on Monday ordered the state’s power authority to develop an...

Tuesday, June 24, 2025, 12:10:00 PM

IAEA Pushes Through With Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant Inspection Despite Military Activity: “We Are Not Stopping”

Following the reported threats of attacks and shelling by Russian forces around the Zaporizhzhia nuclear...

Thursday, September 1, 2022, 11:03:00 AM

Germany Still Hates Nuclear: Berlin Rules Out Extending Nuclear Power Despite Worsening Energy Crisis

Germany’s indecisiveness over its energy future continues, as the country’s environmental and economic minsters on...

Wednesday, March 9, 2022, 02:40:14 PM

Ontario Plans First Large-Scale Nuclear Plant in Over 30 Years

Ontario’s growing electricity demands have prompted the government to consider the construction of a new,...

Thursday, July 6, 2023, 10:11:00 AM

Eastern Europe Central Banks Lead Global Gold-Buying Spree

Eastern European central banks are ramping up gold purchases, with Poland leading global acquisitions as...

Saturday, November 30, 2024, 09:07:00 AM