Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why the Market May Be Misreading Iran | David Woo

Why US Fertilizer Supply Could Matter a Lot More Now | Pat Varas – Sage Potash

Roscan Gold: Mali Discount Hits Kandiole PEA

Recommended

First Majestic Tracking Ahead Of Guidance Following Q1 Production Results

Canadian Gold Drills 19.5 g/t Gold Over 1.0 Metre At Lac Arsenault

Related News

xAI Seeks Emergency Order to Block Ex-Employee From Starting at OpenAI

Elon Musk’s xAI has filed a federal lawsuit against a former engineer, alleging he stole...

Tuesday, September 2, 2025, 03:41:00 PM

Is The Till Empty at OpenAI? $10B Amazon Talks Add Fresh Runway

Near-term liquidity of OpenAI is put into question tied to a $30-billion tranche led by...

Saturday, December 20, 2025, 01:38:00 PM

Apple Blocks ChatGPT-Powered App Over Content Filtering Concerns

Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) blocked an update that adds a feature with a customized version...

Friday, March 3, 2023, 07:39:50 AM

New York Judge Fines Lawyers Who Used ChatGPT To Create Legal Brief

The lawyers who submitted a legal brief that was created using OpenAI’s large language model...

Friday, June 23, 2023, 03:07:00 PM

Did Elon Musk Block Apple On X After OpenAI Partnership?

In an announcement at Apple’s (NASDQ: AAPL) Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) 2024, Apple and OpenAI...

Wednesday, June 12, 2024, 08:04:57 AM