Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why the Market May Be Misreading Iran | David Woo

Why US Fertilizer Supply Could Matter a Lot More Now | Pat Varas – Sage Potash

Roscan Gold: Mali Discount Hits Kandiole PEA

Recommended

Antimony Resources Expands New Discovery Following Trenching

Silver47 Kicks Off 7,000-Meter Drill Campaign at Nevada’s Hughes Project

Related News

OpenAI’s Alarming Shift Via Defense Contractor Partnership Raises Serious Questions

OpenAI, the company behind ChatGPT, has taken a consequential step into the defense sector by...

Monday, December 9, 2024, 10:36:00 AM

Sam Altman Wants To Raise Trillions For The Future Of AI

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman wants to transform the global semiconductor industry. The catch: he needs...

Friday, February 9, 2024, 10:38:00 AM

New York Times v. Microsoft, OpenAI: The Biggest Argument to Copyright Issues of Generative AI

The New York Times has filed a federal lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft, accusing them...

Thursday, December 28, 2023, 11:19:00 AM

SearchGPT: OpenAI’s Bold Move to Challenge Google’s Search Supremacy

OpenAI has unveiled a new initiative in the tech industry’s race to leverage generative artificial...

Friday, July 26, 2024, 02:11:00 PM

OpenAI Seeks Record $40 Billion Investment at $300 Billion Valuation

OpenAI is in early discussions to raise up to $40 billion in funding that would...

Friday, January 31, 2025, 11:10:00 AM