Saturday, December 13, 2025

Latest

Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why Canada Has So Few Projects That Can Be Built Before 2030 | Dan Wilton – First Mining

Guanajuato Silver: Q3 Results Overshadowed By Silver Ripping

I Went to See the Highest Grade Silver on Earth | Nord Precious Metals

Recommended

Steadright Locks Up Goundafa Polymetallic Mine Under Binding MOU

Emerita Resources Awards Contract For Pre-Feasibility Study On Iberian Belt West Project

Related News

Verses AI Sees Genius Outperform OpenAI Model In Tech Challenge

Verses AI (CBOE: VERS) has reached a major milestone in the world of artificial intelligence....
Tuesday, December 17, 2024, 09:20:58 AM

Musk Clashes with Altman Over Trump’s $500B AI Project

Elon Musk challenged the financial viability of a major White House AI initiative on Tuesday,...

Saturday, January 25, 2025, 09:31:00 AM

GPT 3.5: OpenAI Launches ChatGPT Plus; Microsoft Unveils ChatGPT-Powered Teams Premium

OpenAI on Wednesday announced the launch of ChatGPT Plus, the subscription version of its sensational...

Thursday, February 2, 2023, 05:10:00 PM

Lawyer Used ChatGPT For Court And Now He’s In Trouble

A New York lawyer is facing his own court hearing after his business utilized the...

Tuesday, May 30, 2023, 12:43:00 PM

OpenAI Co-Founder Ilya Sutskever Is Starting A New AI Firm

Just a little over a month after he left the company, OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever...

Thursday, June 20, 2024, 02:54:00 PM