Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

Altamira Gold Corp. — sponsored Sponsored · Altamira Gold Corp.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more. 

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

They Found 54 Million Ounces of Silver, Now They Want More | Dale Brittliffe – Kootenay Silver

Advancing Two of Canada’s Largest Undeveloped Gold Projects | Dan Wilton – First Mining Gold

$1 Billion Bet Powering i80 Gold’s Next Phase | Ryan Snow – i-80 Gold

Recommended

Homeland Nickel Signs Binding Offtake With Westwin for 20,000 Tonnes of Concentrate a Year

Golden Cariboo’s First Quesnelle Resource Estimate Tallies 1.19 Million Gold Equivalent Ounces

Related News

OpenAI CFO Excluded From Investor Meetings Amid IPO and Spending Clash With Altman

OpenAI’s Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar has been excluded from investor meetings following her internal...

Monday, April 6, 2026, 10:43:48 AM

UK Test Finds OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra Broke Cyber Scope in 29% of Simulations

OpenAI describes GPT-6 Astra as its most aligned model yet, including an internal test in...

Tuesday, September 29, 2026, 09:07:00 AM

Sam Altman Is Already In Discussions To Return To OpenAI

He may be down, but its not quite certain if he’s actually out. The Verge...

Sunday, November 19, 2023, 07:25:00 AM

xAI’s Grok Was Caught Responding Like It Thinks It’s ChatGPT

Elon Musk’s “rebellious” chatbot Grok, which had a lackluster launch in early November, is behaving...

Monday, December 11, 2023, 12:13:00 PM

OpenAI Mulls Employee Share Sale Valuing The Firm At $86 Billion

OpenAI, the company behind the renowned ChatGPT, is currently in discussions to sell shares held...

Thursday, October 19, 2023, 12:59:00 PM