Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Leave a Reply

Video Articles

We’re At The Start of a Great Silver Boom | Ross McElroy & Andy Bowering – Apollo Silver Corp

Equinox Gold Q1 Earnings: When Everything Goes Wrong

SSR Mining Q1 Earnings: Costs Continue To Climb

Recommended

First Majestic Makes Second Major Discovery At Santa Elena In Just A Year

PTX Metals Hits 235.1 Metres Of Copper, Nickel Mineralization In Longest Intercept To Date At W2

Related News

Was OpenAI Brouhaha Aimed To Derail AI Capability To Complete Grade School Math?

It is being reported that a group of staff researchers at OpenAI conveyed their concerns...

Thursday, November 23, 2023, 12:48:00 PM

Italy Bans ChatGPT Over Privacy Violations

Italy’s data protection agency on Friday ordered a ban on ChatGPT over alleged violations of...

Friday, March 31, 2023, 09:25:40 AM

Altman Rejects Musk’s $97B OpenAI Acquisition Bid: “We’ll Buy Twitter For $9.74B”

OpenAI’s Sam Altman rejected a surprise acquisition bid this week from a consortium led by...

Tuesday, February 11, 2025, 11:11:00 AM

Elon Musk Wants to Create New AI Start-Up to Compete With OpenAI

Elon Musk is reportedly developing plans to launch a new artificial intelligence start-up to compete...

Saturday, April 15, 2023, 01:34:00 PM

Does ChatGPT Have A Blocklist For Certain News Websites?

ChatGPT appears to be testing allowlists and blocklists for news websites, according to the tech...

Wednesday, February 14, 2024, 03:04:00 PM