Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

A 100,000 Ounce Per Year Gold Plan in Utah | Scott Trebilcock — Revival Gold

Can Australia Rival the Athabasca for Uranium? | Marnie Finlayson – DevEx Resources

This Could Be the Next Multi-Million Ounce Gold Camp | Mike Bennett

Recommended

Silver47 Launches 7,000-Meter Hughes Drill Program In Nevada

Advanced Gold Acquires Nevada Property With Historic Production At 1,611 g/t Silver

Related News

Microsoft, OpenAI Reportedly Plans $100-Billion Supercomputer Fueled by Nuclear Power

Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) is reportedly gearing up to construct a colossal $100 billion data center,...

Thursday, May 9, 2024, 01:10:00 PM

Musk Looks to Distract from Tesla Earnings with Microsoft Lawsuit Threat

Elon Musk has a lot on his plate.  On Wednesday, the Twitter owner and Tesla...

Thursday, April 20, 2023, 11:12:15 AM

Apple Blocks ChatGPT-Powered App Over Content Filtering Concerns

Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) blocked an update that adds a feature with a customized version...

Friday, March 3, 2023, 07:39:50 AM

OpenAI Board Found Out About the Launch of ChatGPT on Twitter

Former OpenAI board member Helen Toner revealed that the board was not informed about the...

Friday, May 31, 2024, 08:03:44 AM

Italy Bans ChatGPT Over Privacy Violations

Italy’s data protection agency on Friday ordered a ban on ChatGPT over alleged violations of...

Friday, March 31, 2023, 09:25:40 AM