Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Soma Gold: Q3 Earnings Impacted By Labour Strike

Thesis Gold: The Multi-Billion Dollar Lawyers-Ranch PFS

Why Canada Has So Few Projects That Can Be Built Before 2030 | Dan Wilton – First Mining

Recommended

First Majestic Begins Mine Planning Studies For Two Discoveries At Santa Elena, Names Mani Alkhafaji As President

Steadright To Begin Selling Stockpile Material From Historic Goundafa Mine

Related News

Meet ChaosGPT, the New AI Bot Created to Destroy Humanity and Establish Global Dominance

If this made it to the Internet, it’s safe to say that ChaosGPT has yet...

Thursday, April 13, 2023, 10:58:00 AM

Are Humans Doomed to Destroy ChatGPT?

Humanity has always been afraid of artificial intelligence. We recognize its ability to fundamentally transform...

Monday, February 6, 2023, 02:17:00 PM

Kenya Wants Worldcoin Shut Down

A Kenyan parliamentary committee issued a stern call on Monday, urging the country’s information technology...

Wednesday, October 4, 2023, 03:48:00 PM

ChatGPT Facing FTC Probe Over False Information Allegations

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is conducting an investigation into OpenAI’s ChatGPT artificial intelligence system,...

Thursday, July 13, 2023, 10:51:53 AM

Musk Reveals ChatGPT Competitor, xAI Grok, And It’s Already Provided Fake Information

Elon Musk on Friday night unveiled what is referred to as xAI’s Grok system, which...

Sunday, November 5, 2023, 09:07:00 AM