Stanford Student Finds That Academics Are Abusing ChatGPT

Software developer and student at Stanford University Andrew Gao has spotted something peculiar about recently published studies online: many of them forgot to acknowledge a co-author, OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

Gao, who specializes in artificial intelligence and large language models, took to X, the platform everyone prefers to still call Twitter, to talk about what he found after doing a search for the phrase “As an AI language model” on Google Scholar.

The phrase is how the large language model ChatGPT begins its responses as a blanket disclaimer whenever it’s asked to take on the role of a human – like when prompted to have an opinion on something subjective about something, discuss a theory, or whenever it’s prompted to generate restricted content.

While the phrase has proliferated a good portion of the web, the results that Gao pulled up from Google Scholar — the search engine for scholarly/academic content — was astounding. There were papers upon papers, peer-reviewed journals, book analyses, and more

One would think academics, of all people, would be careful enough to check the output and not have to copy-paste the entire ChatGPT response, including the now-ubiquitous disclaimer phrase. 

According to Gao, and many would agree, using ChatGPT isn’t exactly wrong as it can be useful, but — it needs to be properly acknowledged. This also highlights the fact that AI-generated content is not yet completely reliable as large language models have the tendency to make things up, or “hallucinate.”

In June, a New York judge fined lawyers for using ChatGPT to create a legal brief. Attorneys Peter LoDuca and Steven Schwartz, and their law firm Levidow, Levidow & Oberman were slapped with a $5,000 sanction. They AI-generated document, which was was supposed to be for an otherwise unremarkable torte case, contained made up cases and citations.

Gao’s findings, while funny at first, also brings to light that people will take what ChatGPT gives them as is, without even giving it a once-over to make sure no glaring phrases like “as an AI language model” make it to their final work.  


Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Leave a Reply

Video Articles

Endeavour Mining Q1 Earnings: Cash Flow Is King

G Mining Oko West Feasibility: Move Fast, Break.. Nothing?

New Gold Q1 Earnings: What’s Behind The Market’s Surprising Reaction?

Recommended

First Majestic Posts Record Cash Flows In Q1 As Production Costs Fall

Brazil Potash Secures Funding In Support Of US$2.5 Billion Autozales Project

Related News

Was OpenAI Brouhaha Aimed To Derail AI Capability To Complete Grade School Math?

It is being reported that a group of staff researchers at OpenAI conveyed their concerns...

Thursday, November 23, 2023, 12:48:00 PM

The Sam Altman Story | Founder of OpenAI ChatGPT

Good afternoon, good evening or good morning everyone, today we’re gonna spin a yarn about...

Monday, April 24, 2023, 01:30:00 PM

Robot Lawyer DoNotPay Claims It Will Use GPT-4 for ‘One-Click Lawsuits,’ But GPT-4 Has A Dissenting Opinion

DoNotPay, Inc, the New York-based startup behind the app that claims to be “the world’s...

Thursday, March 16, 2023, 03:01:00 PM

ChatGPT Can Impact 80% of US Jobs — Is it After Yours?

A new study looked into the early impact of large language models (LLMs) such as...

Thursday, March 30, 2023, 05:13:00 PM

Eyeballing Worldcoin, The OpenAI Chief’s Eyeball-Scanning Crypto Venture

Worldcoin, the eyeball-scanning crypto venture led by Open AI’s Sam Altman, has officially launched its...

Tuesday, July 25, 2023, 02:15:00 PM