Tuesday, January 6, 2026

Latest

TikTok Shareholder Agreement Calls For Asset Seizure For Disparaging Statements

TikTok continues to display its Chinese roots, with the latest scandal being that employees, past and present, are at risk of seeing their entire holdings seized should they talk badly of the company. The potential seizure comes from a non-disparagement clause embedded in the firm’s shareholder agreements.

The shareholder agreement, as per Fortune, is said to specifically state that shareholders can’t, “directly or indirectly make any critical, adverse or disparaging statement or comment about the Company or any of the Company’s subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, or employees.”

Failure to comply results in the immediate forfeiture of restricted share units, potentially amounting to substantial financial losses for employees.

TikTok, like many tech firms, utilizes restricted stock units as a means of incentivizing employee loyalty and dedication. However, the inclusion of a clause penalizing any form of criticism against the company in these agreements is a noteworthy departure from industry norms. While such non-disparagement clauses are not entirely uncommon in various contractual agreements, their presence within shareholder agreements is less typical.

READ: US House Panel Approves Bill That Could Force TikTok Sale

Of course, the interpretation of what constitutes disparagement is ambiguous. Critics argue that the vague language employed in TikTok’s clause makes it challenging for employees to discern acceptable boundaries for criticism. In terms of legality, legal experts have stated that as long as it does not obstruct the filing of complaints with government agencies (or prevent or intimidate employees from doing so), then it may be legally sound.

Unsurprisingly TikTok has refrained from commenting on inquiries regarding the implementation of its non-disparagement clause and whether it has ever enforced stock forfeiture as a consequence.


Information for this briefing was found via Fortune and the sources mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why $100 Silver Right Now Would Be a Problem | Keith Neumeyer – First Majestic

Why Industrial Demand Is Changing the Silver Market | David Morgan

Gold and Silver Delivery Is Exposing the Paper Market | Andy Schectman

Recommended

First Phosphate Receives US$530,000 Pre-Payment Under Offtake Agreement

Nord Precious Metals Acquires Gowganda Silver Tailings Project, Securing Feedstock For Silver Processing Strategy

Related News

TikTok Prepared For U.S. Shut Down This Sunday, Here’s What Could Happen

Late Tuesday evening, TikTok reiterated that it is prepared to shut off its app for...

Wednesday, January 15, 2025, 11:07:00 AM

Federal Judge Blocks Montana’s TikTok Ban

A US district judge has halted Montana’s pioneering attempt to ban TikTok, scheduled to take...

Friday, December 1, 2023, 11:19:00 AM

TikTok Hit With €530M Fine for Sending EU Data to China

TikTok was fined €530 million ($600 million) by Ireland’s privacy watchdog earlier this month for...

Wednesday, May 14, 2025, 12:57:00 PM

Looks Like Trump Might Have Been Right About TikTok All Along

Leaked audio recordings from over 80 internal TikTok meetings show that China-based employees of ByteDance,...

Monday, June 20, 2022, 11:39:00 AM

TikTok May Be Gone In US By Sunday As Supreme Court Signals Upholding Ban

The U.S. Supreme Court is reportedly set to uphold a law mandating the sale or...

Tuesday, January 14, 2025, 03:49:00 PM