President Donald Trump’s newest collision with historical fact began with money, not history.
After financial disclosures showed his family’s crypto ventures generated more than $1 billion in 2025, Trump faced renewed questions over whether a sitting president can separate public power from private profit.
His answer was not a legal argument or a financial disclosure detail. It was George Washington.
Sponsored · Selkirk Copper Mines
Trump claimed the American forefather had two desks before the White House, one for business and one for presidential work, and used the anecdote to argue that he himself could discuss business if he wanted to.
“But I choose not to,” Trump said, according to The Independent’s account of the remarks.
The problem is that historians have already treated the story as fiction. A Mount Vernon historian previously said he was not aware of Washington having two desks in the presidential mansion’s study, and prior fact-checks found no evidence that Washington kept a separate business desk beside an official one.
Trump invoked Washington while defending a business empire that has expanded around crypto at the same time his administration has embraced crypto-friendly policy. The president’s 2025 financial disclosure showed more than $1.4 billion in income from crypto-related ventures, including roughly $800 million tied to World Liberty Financial and $635 million from meme coin sales.
Sponsored · Cambria Gold Mines
Reuters reported that Trump said he was not involved in managing his personal finances after the disclosure was released. The White House has denied conflicts of interest, while ethics critics argue the scale of presidential family income from crypto exposes gaps in US conflict rules.
From Washington to Panama Canal
The Washington claim was not isolated. In the same week, Trump also inflated American deaths in the Panama Canal’s construction, overstated his place among presidents who donated their salaries, and again suggested he won three presidential elections, as reported by CNN.
During a July 4 speech tied to America’s 250th anniversary, Trump said “38,000 Americans died” to build the Panama Canal.
A medical history review in Emerging Infectious Diseases said more than 55,000 people worked during the US construction period and an estimated 5,600 died from injury and disease. Those deaths were overwhelmingly among workers from outside the US, especially Afro-Caribbean laborers, not Americans.
Trump also claimed he was “the only president” to give up his salary, but the Herbert Hoover Presidential Library has stated that Hoover and John F. Kennedy donated their presidential salaries before Trump.
Trump did donate salary during much of his first term. The unresolved issue is his second term. The White House Historical Association said in October 2025 that Trump had contributed $66,000 from his salary since January 2025, while correcting a separate report that claimed a much larger contribution.
The third-election claim is the least ambiguous. Trump won the presidency in 2016 and 2024. He lost in 2020. The National Archives lists the official 2020 Electoral College result as 306 for Joe Biden and 232 for Trump.
The common thread is not that Trump gets dates or numbers wrong. It is that each false claim serves a present-tense political function.
The Washington story normalizes private business activity by anchoring it to the first president. The Panama Canal number turns a contested imperial infrastructure project into a narrative of American blood sacrifice. The salary claim casts Trump’s wealth as selfless service. The 2020 claim keeps alive the idea that his current presidency follows three victories rather than two.
Amid the backdrop of the newest financial disclosures, these have made Trump’s second-term business posture more difficult to treat as symbolic.
For Trump, the political benefit is obvious. If Washington did it, Panama required it, Hoover and Kennedy did not match it, and 2020 never interrupted it, then today’s controversies look smaller. The factual record says otherwise.
