President Donald Trump’s trade war aimed at reducing American dependence on Chinese manufacturing appears to be backfiring, as Beijing’s retaliation over rare earth exports is now forcing US automakers to consider expanding production in China rather than bringing it home.
Several major automakers are considering shifting electric motor assembly to China to circumvent Beijing’s export restrictions on rare earth magnets, according to industry executives and people familiar with the discussions. The potential moves would mark an ironic reversal of Trump’s core trade policy objective of reducing dependence on Chinese manufacturing.
China’s April export controls on critical rare earth elements threaten to shut down car factories within weeks, forcing manufacturers into a difficult choice: halt production or consider moving operations to China. Ford Motor (NYSE: F) already suspended production of the Ford Explorer at its Chicago plant for a week in May due to rare earth shortages, demonstrating the immediate impact of Beijing’s leverage.
China’s dominance over rare earth processing — controlling over 90% of global capacity for the magnets essential to electric vehicle motors, power steering systems and numerous automotive components — has given Beijing powerful retaliation tools that appear more effective than traditional tariffs.
The restrictions, implemented as a response to Trump’s sweeping tariffs on Chinese goods, require companies to obtain individual licenses from Beijing for each shipment under a “one batch, one license” system that creates massive supply chain uncertainty.
“Without reliable access to these elements and magnets, automotive suppliers will be unable to produce critical automotive components, including automatic transmissions, throttle bodies, alternators, various motors, sensors, seat belts, speakers, lights, motors, power steering, and cameras,” the Alliance for Automotive Innovation warned Trump administration officials in a May 9 letter representing General Motors, Toyota, Volkswagen and other major manufacturers.
China’s decades-long investment in controlling critical mineral supply chains has created leverage that traditional trade tools struggle to counter. While Trump’s tariffs were designed to make Chinese goods more expensive and encourage domestic production, China’s rare earth restrictions threaten to eliminate US production entirely unless companies relocate to China.
Ford has suspended its 2025 guidance, citing tariff uncertainty that will cost the company an estimated $1.5 billion in earnings. But the rare earth crisis presents a more fundamental challenge to American manufacturing independence.
Ideas under active consideration include producing electric motors in Chinese factories or shipping American-made motors to China for magnet installation, according to people familiar with the discussions. The restrictions apply only to raw magnets, creating what industry officials see as a deliberate incentive for foreign companies to move final assembly operations to China.
Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) CEO Elon Musk said during the company’s recent earnings call that China’s rare earth restrictions are affecting development of the company’s humanoid robot, Optimus, while German auto parts supplier Bosch described China’s licensing process as “complex and time-consuming, partly due to the need to collect and provide a lot of information.”
China’s restrictions have already cut rare earth magnet exports by 51% in April compared to the previous year, while forcing global manufacturers to either accept Beijing’s terms or face production shutdowns that could devastate their businesses.
Industry analysts warn that existing stockpiles could be depleted within three to six months, creating an urgent timeline for companies to either secure Chinese licenses or relocate production to China — precisely the opposite outcome Trump’s trade policies were designed to achieve.
Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.
