Amazon Sued for Inflating Prices, Penalizing Merchants for Offering Lower Prices on Rival Sites

E-commerce giant Amazon was slapped with a lawsuit from the state of California on Wednesday, over allegedly violating anti-trust laws by penalizing third-party merchants for selling their products at lower prices on competing websites.

According to the Wall Street Journal which obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Attorney General Rob Bonta alleged Amazon forces third-party merchants into agreements penalizing them in the event they offer products at reduced prices on rival sites such as Target or Walmart. For those sellers failing to comply, the e-commerce giant deliberately places their products lower in search results, sometimes removes them from the site’s “buy box,” or eliminates the products entirely.

Likewise, the complaint also accuses Amazon of coercing wholesalers into similar agreements where they face penalties in the event Amazon cuts prices to match competitors and profit margins slip below a certain threshold. In fact, wholesalers are sometimes forced to compensate the e-commerce company if rival online retailers reduce their products’ prices. And, given Amazon’s strong oligopolistic dominance in the space, the third-party merchants and wholesalers are often left with no choice but to comply with the demands.

“Amazon coerces merchants into agreements that keep prices artificially high, knowing full-well that they can’t afford to say no,” said Bonta. “Many of the products we buy online would be cheaper if market forces were left unconstrained.” California, which is home to the largest population and economy, strongly influences how major companies conduct their operations in the US. The suit is requesting the court to bar Amazon from continuing the anti-competition practices, and appoint a watchdog to ensure the company complies. In addition, California is also pursuing damages caused to the state’s economy, as well as $2,500 for every account the court proves Amazon violated California’s civil and professional code.

Information for this briefing was found via the WSJ. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Mergers Set the Stage for Uranium’s Growth Cycle | Forum-Baselode Merger

The Goal is Gold Production as Soon as Possible! | Gordon Robb – ESGOLD Corp.

Snowline Gold: The Multi Billion Dollar Valley PEA

Recommended

First Majestic Produces 7.9 Silver Equivalent Ounces In Q2, Lifts Production Guidance

Antimony Resources Drills 4.17% Antimony Over 7.4 Metres At Bald Hill

Related News

Newsom’s Veto Blocks Undocumented Immigrants from State Home Loan Program

California Governor Gavin Newsom has vetoed Assembly Bill 1840, which aimed to expand the California...

Monday, September 9, 2024, 09:30:00 AM

Amazon Rallies 8% On Revenue, Profit Jumps Following Cost-Cutting Measures

Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) CEO Andy Jassy’s strategic financial moves this earnings season have garnered widespread...

Friday, August 4, 2023, 08:24:13 AM

Airbnb Under Fire Amid Cancellation Due To California Wildfires

As the raging California wildfires consume thousands of acres and displace tens of thousands of...

Thursday, January 9, 2025, 10:22:00 AM

Amazon Autos Takes On Car Dealerships With A New Way To Buy Cars Online

Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) launched Amazon Autos on Tuesday, an e-commerce platform allowing customers to browse,...

Thursday, December 12, 2024, 04:33:00 PM

Jeff Bezos’ Wealth Surges to New Record After Pentagon Cancels JEDI Contract With Microsoft

Jeff Bezos has now anchored his position as the world’s wealthiest person in modern history,...

Saturday, July 10, 2021, 03:11:00 PM