Amazon Sued for Inflating Prices, Penalizing Merchants for Offering Lower Prices on Rival Sites

E-commerce giant Amazon was slapped with a lawsuit from the state of California on Wednesday, over allegedly violating anti-trust laws by penalizing third-party merchants for selling their products at lower prices on competing websites.

According to the Wall Street Journal which obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Attorney General Rob Bonta alleged Amazon forces third-party merchants into agreements penalizing them in the event they offer products at reduced prices on rival sites such as Target or Walmart. For those sellers failing to comply, the e-commerce giant deliberately places their products lower in search results, sometimes removes them from the site’s “buy box,” or eliminates the products entirely.

Likewise, the complaint also accuses Amazon of coercing wholesalers into similar agreements where they face penalties in the event Amazon cuts prices to match competitors and profit margins slip below a certain threshold. In fact, wholesalers are sometimes forced to compensate the e-commerce company if rival online retailers reduce their products’ prices. And, given Amazon’s strong oligopolistic dominance in the space, the third-party merchants and wholesalers are often left with no choice but to comply with the demands.

“Amazon coerces merchants into agreements that keep prices artificially high, knowing full-well that they can’t afford to say no,” said Bonta. “Many of the products we buy online would be cheaper if market forces were left unconstrained.” California, which is home to the largest population and economy, strongly influences how major companies conduct their operations in the US. The suit is requesting the court to bar Amazon from continuing the anti-competition practices, and appoint a watchdog to ensure the company complies. In addition, California is also pursuing damages caused to the state’s economy, as well as $2,500 for every account the court proves Amazon violated California’s civil and professional code.

Information for this briefing was found via the WSJ. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Leave a Reply

Video Articles

Endeavour Mining Q1 Earnings: Cash Flow Is King

G Mining Oko West Feasibility: Move Fast, Break.. Nothing?

New Gold Q1 Earnings: What’s Behind The Market’s Surprising Reaction?

Recommended

First Majestic Posts Record Cash Flows In Q1 As Production Costs Fall

Brazil Potash Secures Funding In Support Of US$2.5 Billion Autozales Project

Related News

Tech Names Top Layoffs In Past Year As Job Cuts Continue

Tech names are leading the pack of companies who have had massive layoffs in the...

Wednesday, January 18, 2023, 03:01:00 PM

California Bans Sales of Gas Cars, Then Tells Citizens to Avoid Charging EVs During Heatwave

The government of California, which just last week became the first state to ban the...

Wednesday, August 31, 2022, 06:24:42 PM

Amazon: Consensus Price Target Falls After Disappointing Q2 Results

Amazon.com Inc (NASDAQ: AMZN) reported its second quarter financial results on July 29. The company...

Monday, August 2, 2021, 12:09:00 PM

California To Ban Sale Of Diesel Trucks In 2036, Forces Trucking Firms To Go Electric

Electric pickups and big-rig’s might hardly even exist, but California is determined to force their...

Sunday, April 30, 2023, 11:17:00 AM

Amazon’s Satellite Network Faces Skyrocketing Costs in $20 Billion Gamble

Amazon’s (NASDAQ: AMZN) ambitious satellite internet initiative, Project Kuiper, is now projected to cost between...

Thursday, September 12, 2024, 11:33:00 AM