Amazon Sued for Inflating Prices, Penalizing Merchants for Offering Lower Prices on Rival Sites

E-commerce giant Amazon was slapped with a lawsuit from the state of California on Wednesday, over allegedly violating anti-trust laws by penalizing third-party merchants for selling their products at lower prices on competing websites.

According to the Wall Street Journal which obtained a copy of the lawsuit filed in San Francisco Superior Court, Attorney General Rob Bonta alleged Amazon forces third-party merchants into agreements penalizing them in the event they offer products at reduced prices on rival sites such as Target or Walmart. For those sellers failing to comply, the e-commerce giant deliberately places their products lower in search results, sometimes removes them from the site’s “buy box,” or eliminates the products entirely.

Likewise, the complaint also accuses Amazon of coercing wholesalers into similar agreements where they face penalties in the event Amazon cuts prices to match competitors and profit margins slip below a certain threshold. In fact, wholesalers are sometimes forced to compensate the e-commerce company if rival online retailers reduce their products’ prices. And, given Amazon’s strong oligopolistic dominance in the space, the third-party merchants and wholesalers are often left with no choice but to comply with the demands.

“Amazon coerces merchants into agreements that keep prices artificially high, knowing full-well that they can’t afford to say no,” said Bonta. “Many of the products we buy online would be cheaper if market forces were left unconstrained.” California, which is home to the largest population and economy, strongly influences how major companies conduct their operations in the US. The suit is requesting the court to bar Amazon from continuing the anti-competition practices, and appoint a watchdog to ensure the company complies. In addition, California is also pursuing damages caused to the state’s economy, as well as $2,500 for every account the court proves Amazon violated California’s civil and professional code.

Information for this briefing was found via the WSJ. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

The Goal is Gold Production as Soon as Possible! | Gordon Robb – ESGOLD Corp.

Snowline Gold: The Multi Billion Dollar Valley PEA

Euro Sun: Rovina Copper-Gold Project Secures Some Major Funding

Recommended

Antimony Resources Drills 4.17% Antimony Over 7.4 Metres At Bald Hill

ESGold To Expand Mine Building At Montauban In Advance Of Gold & Silver Production

Related News

California Gov. Newsom On Oil Refinery Profits: “You Guys Are All Being Screwed”

The state aims to be the first to impose an oil price gouging penalty targeted...

Wednesday, December 7, 2022, 10:15:00 AM

Battle of the Billionaires: Musk Blasts Amazon for Trying to Cripple SpaceX Starlink Satellite Project

The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, and the world’s second richest man, Jeff Bezos, have...

Wednesday, January 27, 2021, 11:57:00 AM

Amazon Sent Tumbling After Dramatic Earnings and Revenue Miss, Disappointing Q4 Guidance

It was around this time last year that we were all gawking at Amazon’s (NASDAQ:...

Saturday, October 30, 2021, 10:08:00 AM

Tax Season Love Story: WallStreetBets Romeo Seeks Million-Dollar Marriage of Convenience

A Los Angeles-based Reddit user has taken an unconventional approach to year-end financial planning. The...

Saturday, December 14, 2024, 11:13:00 AM

New California Legislation Seeks to Ban Selling Tobacco Products to Those Born After 2006

California lawmakers will soon tackle Assembly Bill 935, the legislation prohibiting selling cigarettes and other...

Wednesday, March 15, 2023, 05:16:00 PM