Delivery Problems Are Growing For EV Manufacturers

Electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers are facing several daunting obstacles. Most prominently, demand for the high-priced cars seems to be waning, so much so that Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) felt compelled earlier this month to slash the prices of its most popular models by up to 20% in the U.S. and Europe. In addition, some supply chain issues continue to exist, but the scope of that problem seems to be diminishing.

A third major challenge, particularly for start-up EV makers is delivery logistics. The concern here is very basic: customers are not receiving the vehicles they have purchased on as timely a basis as they should. The risk is that future potential customers may consider such delays unacceptable and decide to look elsewhere for their car needs, much as they would for other products and brands where delivery is not as convenient and seamless as they would like.

Unfortunately, and unlike supply chain challenges, delivery issues seem to be getting more problematic. Worse, no easy solutions appear to be available.

The table below shows unit delivery and production statistics by quarter in 2022 for Tesla and the two major EV start-ups in the U.S., Lucid Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: LCID) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (NASDAQ: RIVN).

Production and Delivery Data on Selected EV Manufacturers 

Full-Year 20224Q 20223Q 20222Q 20221Q 2022
Tesla
  Vehicles Delivered to Customers1,313,851 405,278 343,830 254,695 310,048 
  Vehicles Produced1,369,611 439,701 365,923 258,580 305,407 
  Delivery Shortfall(55,760)(34,423)(22,093)(3,885)4,641 
  Ratio of Deliveries to Production96%92%94%98%102%
Lucid
  Vehicles Delivered to Customers (A)4,369 1,932 1,398 1,039 
  Vehicles Produced (A)7,180 3,493 2,282 1,405 
  Delivery Shortfall (A)(2,811)(1,561)(884)(366)
  Ratio of Deliveries to Production61%55%61%74%
Rivian
  Vehicles Delivered to Customers20,332 8,054 6,584 4,467 1,227 
  Vehicles Produced24,337 10,020 7,363 4,401 2,553 
  Delivery Shortfall(4,005)(1,966)(779)66 (1,326)
  Ratio of Deliveries to Production84%80%89%101%48%
(A) Lucid 2Q 2022 figures shown above are for the first half of 2022. Source: Company filings.

In terms of both units and as a percentage of production, Tesla is delivering fewer cars than it produces in each quarter to the customers which bought the vehicles. Its ratio of quarterly deliveries to production, 92% in 4Q 2022, is still reasonably high, but that ratio has slipped noticeably since 2Q 2022 (98%). More concerning is the quarterly gap in units between Tesla deliveries and production is increasing markedly, about 34,000 in 4Q 2022 versus 4,000 in 2Q 2022.

Two chief reasons seem to be causing and amplifying the delivery shortfalls:

  • 1) the presence of more EV manufacturers using the direct-to-consumer business model as opposed to the traditional franchise-dealership model; and
  • 2) a sharp reduction in the number of vehicle haulage truck drivers.

The first issue shows no signs of changing, and the second will take quite some time (and much higher payments to prospective drivers) to solve. Indeed, last summer, the CEO of United Road Services, one of the biggest vehicle haulers in the U.S., estimated that 30% of vehicle haulage drivers had left the business since the onset of COVID due to the physically and mentally draining aspects of the job and the shrinking premium pay that used to exist between car hauling and general freight truck drivers.

For start-up EV makers, the amend phrase, “When giant Tesla gets the sniffles, other EV makers catch a cold” seems to apply. In 4Q 2022, Rivian only delivered 80% of the cars it produced; Lucid was even worse, delivering just 55% of its manufactured EVs.

If one discards the worst-case and unlikely explanation for these enormous shortfalls — that the companies are producing many vehicles they have not yet sold — an investor must conclude that delivery logistics problems are worsening for Rivian and Lucid.  In order to grow and maintain a satisfied customer base, this key issue must be resolved.


Information for this briefing was found via Edgar and the sources mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Gold Drilling Scaled to 60,000 Meters: How Big Can This Get? | Roger Rosmus – Goliath Resources

Baselode Energy To Acquire Forum Energy: The Merger Of Equals Deal

TriStar Gold: The Revised Castelo de Sonhos Prefeasibility Study

Recommended

Antimony Resources Drills 4.17% Antimony Over 7.4 Metres At Bald Hill

ESGold To Expand Mine Building At Montauban In Advance Of Gold & Silver Production

Related News

California To Ban Sale Of Diesel Trucks In 2036, Forces Trucking Firms To Go Electric

Electric pickups and big-rig’s might hardly even exist, but California is determined to force their...

Sunday, April 30, 2023, 11:17:00 AM

Polestar Elects To Go Public Via Spac Despite Poor Industry Track Record

On September 27, Polestar Performance AB, a premium electric vehicle manufacturer headquartered in Sweden, agreed...

Sunday, October 3, 2021, 01:01:00 PM

China’s Improved EV Sales Overshadowed By Saltwater Fires

Two developments related to electric vehicles (EVs) have occurred in recent weeks: one has clear...

Sunday, September 10, 2023, 11:41:00 AM

Fairytales: In 2020 The Stock Market’s Divorce From Reality Became Formal

Feature image adapted from art by Flickr user bedgemont_dm. “2020” because it was the year...

Sunday, January 3, 2021, 09:00:00 AM

SPAC to the Future: SBE Stock Shows The Electric Potential In ChargePoint

This obscenely overvalued stock market is especially noisy. The information trying to move it flies...

Sunday, January 24, 2021, 08:30:00 AM