Robinhood Pays $65 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Misleading Customers About its Revenue Sources

When it rains, it pours! Only a day after a Massachusetts regulator filed a complaint against Robinhood accusing the popular trading app of aggressively marketing to inexperienced users and failing to implement controls against them, Robinhood has now agreed to pay a separate $65 million settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged the company over failing to properly inform users about the payments it received for handling their trades.

According to a statement released by the SEC, the case is based on disclosures from 2015 to 2018, which accuse Robinhood of making inaccurate statements and omitting information on the FAQ portion of its website regarding its biggest source of revenue – particularly receiving money from trading firms in exchange for its order flow. The trading app’s main selling point was that trading was “commission free,” but turns out that the company was instead making its copious amounts of revenue via excessively high payment for order flow rates.

Although payments for order flow among Wall Street firms is highly frowned upon, it is still within the realm of legality when conducted by electronic brokers. However in this case, Robinhood has been put on the chopping block because it is the app’s largest source of revenue, as the company made $180 million in the second quarter off trades. Moreover, the SEC order also accused Robinhood of issuing inferior trade prices that ended up costing users $34.1 million, even after the savings from not paying commission are considered.

Large market makers, such as Virtu and Citadel Securities, pay electronic brokers such as Robinhood to execute customer trades. In exchange, the broker receives a small payment for the shares that were transferred, which can quickly turn into millions when users trade in such volumes as they have been amid the pandemic. In response to the SEC order, Robinhood did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but noted that “the settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today.”


Information for this briefing was found via the SEC. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Can Historic Silver Data Turn Into a New Mine? | Rob Macdonald – Equity Metals

Is This the Most Overlooked Critical Mineral? (+1000% Move) | Guy Bourassa – Scandium Canada

Is Gold Entering a New 15-Year Cycle? | Rob Husband

Recommended

Silver47 Launches 7,000-Meter Hughes Drill Program In Nevada

Advanced Gold Acquires Nevada Property With Historic Production At 1,611 g/t Silver

Related News

Robinhood To Face Increased Competition From Acorns Grow, A Spare-Change Investing Platform

Reflecting the dramatic change in market mood over the last handful of months from embracing...

Monday, January 10, 2022, 03:32:00 PM

Did Robinhood’s President Trade AMC And GME On Material Non-Public Information?

Earlier today, the documents of a class action lawsuit against Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) were...

Wednesday, September 29, 2021, 08:03:44 PM

Robinhood Soars on Plans to Extend its Trading Day Hours; Rally Seems Too Strong for the Substance of the Announcement

On March 29, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD) stock soared US$3.43, or 27%, to US$16.24...

Saturday, April 2, 2022, 05:11:00 PM

Robinhood Falls 6% Following Trading Volume, Active Users Dipping In July

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (Nasdaq: HOOD) announced its operating data for July 2022 last night after...

Friday, August 19, 2022, 11:03:00 AM

SEC’s Adverse Decision on Payment for Order Flow Negatively Impacts Robinhood

On December 14, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to implement perhaps the...

Saturday, December 17, 2022, 05:54:00 PM