Robinhood Pays $65 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Misleading Customers About its Revenue Sources

When it rains, it pours! Only a day after a Massachusetts regulator filed a complaint against Robinhood accusing the popular trading app of aggressively marketing to inexperienced users and failing to implement controls against them, Robinhood has now agreed to pay a separate $65 million settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged the company over failing to properly inform users about the payments it received for handling their trades.

According to a statement released by the SEC, the case is based on disclosures from 2015 to 2018, which accuse Robinhood of making inaccurate statements and omitting information on the FAQ portion of its website regarding its biggest source of revenue – particularly receiving money from trading firms in exchange for its order flow. The trading app’s main selling point was that trading was “commission free,” but turns out that the company was instead making its copious amounts of revenue via excessively high payment for order flow rates.

Although payments for order flow among Wall Street firms is highly frowned upon, it is still within the realm of legality when conducted by electronic brokers. However in this case, Robinhood has been put on the chopping block because it is the app’s largest source of revenue, as the company made $180 million in the second quarter off trades. Moreover, the SEC order also accused Robinhood of issuing inferior trade prices that ended up costing users $34.1 million, even after the savings from not paying commission are considered.

Large market makers, such as Virtu and Citadel Securities, pay electronic brokers such as Robinhood to execute customer trades. In exchange, the broker receives a small payment for the shares that were transferred, which can quickly turn into millions when users trade in such volumes as they have been amid the pandemic. In response to the SEC order, Robinhood did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but noted that “the settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today.”


Information for this briefing was found via the SEC. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Higher Gold Prices Are Changing What Counts as a Real Discovery | Mike Bennett – Altamira Gold

Why Silver Still Hasn’t Seen the Real Mania | Craig Hemke

Why Copper Needs a Much Higher Price to Fix the Supply Problem | Greg Ferron – PTX Metals

Recommended

Crossroads Gold Closes Rox-ex Acquisition, Adds Pambula and Club Terrace to Australian Pipeline

Goliath Resources Kicks Off Fully Funded 50,000 Metre Drill Program At Surebet

Related News

Cboe Global Markets In Talks With Robinhood As Potential Equity Partner For Recently Acquired Digital Exchange

Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (Cboe: CBOE) said on Thursday that it has been talking with...

Friday, August 26, 2022, 09:41:33 AM

Put Options Confusion May Lead Robinhood Users to See Their Profits from Bets Against SVB Disappear by End of Week

Robinhood clients are complaining that the trading app isn’t letting them cash in on their...

Thursday, March 16, 2023, 05:10:00 PM

Robinhood Employs Unusual, Aggressive Tactics to Defend Payment for Order Flow Practice

Robinhood Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD) is employing very aggressive tactics to defend and preserve its...

Thursday, September 16, 2021, 04:39:00 PM

Robinhood Ends 2021 With US$1.82 Billion In Revenue, US$3.69 Billion Net Loss

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD) released on Thursday its fourth quarter and full-year 2021 financial...

Friday, January 28, 2022, 09:30:00 AM

Robinhood Slapped with Class Action Lawsuit Over Backdoor Commission Fees

As Robinhood’s fall from grace continues, it appears that the popular trading app has been...

Sunday, December 27, 2020, 03:37:00 PM