Robinhood Pays $65 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Misleading Customers About its Revenue Sources

When it rains, it pours! Only a day after a Massachusetts regulator filed a complaint against Robinhood accusing the popular trading app of aggressively marketing to inexperienced users and failing to implement controls against them, Robinhood has now agreed to pay a separate $65 million settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged the company over failing to properly inform users about the payments it received for handling their trades.

According to a statement released by the SEC, the case is based on disclosures from 2015 to 2018, which accuse Robinhood of making inaccurate statements and omitting information on the FAQ portion of its website regarding its biggest source of revenue – particularly receiving money from trading firms in exchange for its order flow. The trading app’s main selling point was that trading was “commission free,” but turns out that the company was instead making its copious amounts of revenue via excessively high payment for order flow rates.

Although payments for order flow among Wall Street firms is highly frowned upon, it is still within the realm of legality when conducted by electronic brokers. However in this case, Robinhood has been put on the chopping block because it is the app’s largest source of revenue, as the company made $180 million in the second quarter off trades. Moreover, the SEC order also accused Robinhood of issuing inferior trade prices that ended up costing users $34.1 million, even after the savings from not paying commission are considered.

Large market makers, such as Virtu and Citadel Securities, pay electronic brokers such as Robinhood to execute customer trades. In exchange, the broker receives a small payment for the shares that were transferred, which can quickly turn into millions when users trade in such volumes as they have been amid the pandemic. In response to the SEC order, Robinhood did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but noted that “the settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today.”


Information for this briefing was found via the SEC. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why Silver Needs to Slow Down to Go Higher | Dan Dickson – Endeavour Silver

Silver Dips Are Getting Bought, This Is How Breakouts Start | John Feneck

Why $100 Silver Right Now Would Be a Problem | Keith Neumeyer – First Majestic

Recommended

NexGen Launches 42,000 Metre Drill Program At PCE While Expanding Mineralized Footprint

First Majestic Hits 2025 Guidance, Producing 31.1 Million Silver Equivalent Ounces, Increases Dividend

Related News

Gamblers Resort to Stock Trading as Means of Filling Empty Void

While almost the entire country went into lockdown mode as the government imposed stay-at-home orders,...

Sunday, May 24, 2020, 01:51:00 PM

Robinhood Creating Platform to Allow Amateur Investors to Buy IPOs, Including its Own

While still brushing off daytrader anguish and congressional scrutiny after its decision to pause trading...

Saturday, March 27, 2021, 11:21:00 AM

Robinhood Falls 6% Following Trading Volume, Active Users Dipping In July

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (Nasdaq: HOOD) announced its operating data for July 2022 last night after...

Friday, August 19, 2022, 11:03:00 AM

Robinhood Plummets 10% After Q1 2022 Financials Show Decline In Revenue, Active Users

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (Nasdaq: HOOD) released on Thursday its Q1 2022 financial results. The company...

Friday, April 29, 2022, 10:52:00 AM

Robinhood Working on Paycheck Early Deposit Feature

In yet another effort to provide all the tools necessary for Americans to liquidate any...

Thursday, September 2, 2021, 11:48:00 AM