Robinhood Pays $65 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Misleading Customers About its Revenue Sources

When it rains, it pours! Only a day after a Massachusetts regulator filed a complaint against Robinhood accusing the popular trading app of aggressively marketing to inexperienced users and failing to implement controls against them, Robinhood has now agreed to pay a separate $65 million settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged the company over failing to properly inform users about the payments it received for handling their trades.

According to a statement released by the SEC, the case is based on disclosures from 2015 to 2018, which accuse Robinhood of making inaccurate statements and omitting information on the FAQ portion of its website regarding its biggest source of revenue – particularly receiving money from trading firms in exchange for its order flow. The trading app’s main selling point was that trading was “commission free,” but turns out that the company was instead making its copious amounts of revenue via excessively high payment for order flow rates.

Although payments for order flow among Wall Street firms is highly frowned upon, it is still within the realm of legality when conducted by electronic brokers. However in this case, Robinhood has been put on the chopping block because it is the app’s largest source of revenue, as the company made $180 million in the second quarter off trades. Moreover, the SEC order also accused Robinhood of issuing inferior trade prices that ended up costing users $34.1 million, even after the savings from not paying commission are considered.

Large market makers, such as Virtu and Citadel Securities, pay electronic brokers such as Robinhood to execute customer trades. In exchange, the broker receives a small payment for the shares that were transferred, which can quickly turn into millions when users trade in such volumes as they have been amid the pandemic. In response to the SEC order, Robinhood did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but noted that “the settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today.”


Information for this briefing was found via the SEC. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

The Smart Money is Doubling Down | Fokus Mining & Gold Candle

The Silver Story That Could Surprise the Market | Dan Earle – Highlander Silver

Gold Fueled Agnico Eagle’s Best Year Ever | Q4 2025 Earnings

Recommended

Goliath Resources Sees 13% Grade Boost As Stifel Draws Parallels To Great Bear

First Majestic Q4 2025: Record Revenue, Earnings, Annual Silver Output

Related News

Robinhood: Will The Coming Payment for Order Flow Restriction Hurt Earnings?

After the markets closed on February 8, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD) announced 4Q 2022...

Sunday, February 12, 2023, 11:24:00 AM

Robinhood Employs Unusual, Aggressive Tactics to Defend Payment for Order Flow Practice

Robinhood Markets Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD) is employing very aggressive tactics to defend and preserve its...

Thursday, September 16, 2021, 04:39:00 PM

Amid Market Volatility, Robinhood Halts Overnight Trading Due to Partner Issues

Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD) on Monday temporarily suspended its overnight trading service due to issues with...

Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 12:57:00 PM

Can FTX Even Afford To Buy Robinhood?

Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD) shares jumped 14% on June 27 after Bloomberg reported that...

Saturday, July 2, 2022, 09:00:00 AM

Robinhood Sent Crashing Amid Reports Hackers Stole Internal Security Tools to Access Users’ Accounts

Shares of Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD) were sent into a nosedive Wednesday afternoon, after reports emerged...

Thursday, November 11, 2021, 02:53:00 PM