Robinhood Pays $65 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Misleading Customers About its Revenue Sources

When it rains, it pours! Only a day after a Massachusetts regulator filed a complaint against Robinhood accusing the popular trading app of aggressively marketing to inexperienced users and failing to implement controls against them, Robinhood has now agreed to pay a separate $65 million settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged the company over failing to properly inform users about the payments it received for handling their trades.

According to a statement released by the SEC, the case is based on disclosures from 2015 to 2018, which accuse Robinhood of making inaccurate statements and omitting information on the FAQ portion of its website regarding its biggest source of revenue – particularly receiving money from trading firms in exchange for its order flow. The trading app’s main selling point was that trading was “commission free,” but turns out that the company was instead making its copious amounts of revenue via excessively high payment for order flow rates.

Although payments for order flow among Wall Street firms is highly frowned upon, it is still within the realm of legality when conducted by electronic brokers. However in this case, Robinhood has been put on the chopping block because it is the app’s largest source of revenue, as the company made $180 million in the second quarter off trades. Moreover, the SEC order also accused Robinhood of issuing inferior trade prices that ended up costing users $34.1 million, even after the savings from not paying commission are considered.

Large market makers, such as Virtu and Citadel Securities, pay electronic brokers such as Robinhood to execute customer trades. In exchange, the broker receives a small payment for the shares that were transferred, which can quickly turn into millions when users trade in such volumes as they have been amid the pandemic. In response to the SEC order, Robinhood did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but noted that “the settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today.”


Information for this briefing was found via the SEC. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

First Majestic Q1 Earnings: A Bang Up Quarter

Copper’s Structural Shortage May Be Here to Stay | Colin Joudrie – Selkirk Copper

Why Barrick’s “Strong” Quarter Wasn’t So Strong | Q1 2026 Earnings

Recommended

Power Metallic Pushes Deeper Into Saudi Arabia With Amaar Mining Tie-Up

Canada Confirms First Hantavirus Case Linked to MV Hondius Cruise Ship Outbreak

Related News

Robinhood Attempts To Calm Investors Following 27% Drop

Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) this morning attempted to calm investors after the name ultimately dropped...

Friday, August 6, 2021, 09:19:48 AM

Robinhood: Did Their President Trade On Non Public Information?

Today we chat about how Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) President Jim Swartwout, who was potentially...

Friday, October 1, 2021, 01:30:00 PM

Robinhood Posts First Positive Adjusted EBITDA In Five Quarters

After the market closed yesterday, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (NASDAQ: HOOD) announced 3Q 2022 results which...

Thursday, November 3, 2022, 12:14:00 PM

Robinhood Expands Prediction Hub To Football In Kalshi Tie-up

Robinhood (NASDAQ: HOOD) is moving deeper into sports wagering–adjacent territory, announcing on Tuesday that it...

Wednesday, August 20, 2025, 08:29:08 AM

Robinhood Stock Sent Falling in Late Trading After Suffering Customer Data Breach

Shares of Robinhood Markets Inc (NASDAQ: HOOD) were sent lower in after-hours trading on Monday,...

Tuesday, November 9, 2021, 10:12:00 AM