Sunday, January 11, 2026

Latest

Robinhood Pays $65 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Misleading Customers About its Revenue Sources

When it rains, it pours! Only a day after a Massachusetts regulator filed a complaint against Robinhood accusing the popular trading app of aggressively marketing to inexperienced users and failing to implement controls against them, Robinhood has now agreed to pay a separate $65 million settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged the company over failing to properly inform users about the payments it received for handling their trades.

According to a statement released by the SEC, the case is based on disclosures from 2015 to 2018, which accuse Robinhood of making inaccurate statements and omitting information on the FAQ portion of its website regarding its biggest source of revenue – particularly receiving money from trading firms in exchange for its order flow. The trading app’s main selling point was that trading was “commission free,” but turns out that the company was instead making its copious amounts of revenue via excessively high payment for order flow rates.

Although payments for order flow among Wall Street firms is highly frowned upon, it is still within the realm of legality when conducted by electronic brokers. However in this case, Robinhood has been put on the chopping block because it is the app’s largest source of revenue, as the company made $180 million in the second quarter off trades. Moreover, the SEC order also accused Robinhood of issuing inferior trade prices that ended up costing users $34.1 million, even after the savings from not paying commission are considered.

Large market makers, such as Virtu and Citadel Securities, pay electronic brokers such as Robinhood to execute customer trades. In exchange, the broker receives a small payment for the shares that were transferred, which can quickly turn into millions when users trade in such volumes as they have been amid the pandemic. In response to the SEC order, Robinhood did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but noted that “the settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today.”


Information for this briefing was found via the SEC. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why $100 Silver Right Now Would Be a Problem | Keith Neumeyer – First Majestic

Why Industrial Demand Is Changing the Silver Market | David Morgan

Gold and Silver Delivery Is Exposing the Paper Market | Andy Schectman

Recommended

Antimony Resources Drills 8.48% Sb Over 3 Metres, 2.07% Sb Over 27 Metres At Bald Hill

Steadright To Acquire 75% Interest In Moroccan Copper-Lead-Silver Project

Related News

Massachusetts Regulator Files Complaint Against Robinhood, Alleging Manipulation of Inexperienced Investors

It appears that the popular trading app Robinhood is finally in the hot seat, after...

Wednesday, December 16, 2020, 04:51:00 PM

Robinhood: Did Their President Trade On Non Public Information?

Today we chat about how Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) President Jim Swartwout, who was potentially...

Friday, October 1, 2021, 01:30:00 PM

Robinhood Pays $70 Million to Resolve Regulatory Allegations

It appears that Robinhood faces yet another obstacle in the path towards its planned IPO:...

Wednesday, June 30, 2021, 03:30:00 PM

SEC’s Adverse Decision on Payment for Order Flow Negatively Impacts Robinhood

On December 14, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted to implement perhaps the...

Saturday, December 17, 2022, 05:54:00 PM

Robinhood Stock Sent Falling in Late Trading After Suffering Customer Data Breach

Shares of Robinhood Markets Inc (NASDAQ: HOOD) were sent lower in after-hours trading on Monday,...

Tuesday, November 9, 2021, 10:12:00 AM