Robinhood Pays $65 Million to Settle SEC Charges Over Misleading Customers About its Revenue Sources

When it rains, it pours! Only a day after a Massachusetts regulator filed a complaint against Robinhood accusing the popular trading app of aggressively marketing to inexperienced users and failing to implement controls against them, Robinhood has now agreed to pay a separate $65 million settlement after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged the company over failing to properly inform users about the payments it received for handling their trades.

According to a statement released by the SEC, the case is based on disclosures from 2015 to 2018, which accuse Robinhood of making inaccurate statements and omitting information on the FAQ portion of its website regarding its biggest source of revenue – particularly receiving money from trading firms in exchange for its order flow. The trading app’s main selling point was that trading was “commission free,” but turns out that the company was instead making its copious amounts of revenue via excessively high payment for order flow rates.

Although payments for order flow among Wall Street firms is highly frowned upon, it is still within the realm of legality when conducted by electronic brokers. However in this case, Robinhood has been put on the chopping block because it is the app’s largest source of revenue, as the company made $180 million in the second quarter off trades. Moreover, the SEC order also accused Robinhood of issuing inferior trade prices that ended up costing users $34.1 million, even after the savings from not paying commission are considered.

Large market makers, such as Virtu and Citadel Securities, pay electronic brokers such as Robinhood to execute customer trades. In exchange, the broker receives a small payment for the shares that were transferred, which can quickly turn into millions when users trade in such volumes as they have been amid the pandemic. In response to the SEC order, Robinhood did not admit or deny wrongdoing, but noted that “the settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today.”

Selkirk Copper Mines — sponsored Sponsored · Selkirk Copper Mines

Information for this briefing was found via the SEC. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

This Copper Mine Costs 1/6 to Restart | SSR Mining X Roxmore

Why Cambria Hit Pause on Its Massive Copper-Gold Spinout

Can Gold Rescue Washington From Its Debt Trap? | Andy Schectman – Miles Franklin

Recommended

Blue Jay Gold Signs Ocean Partners Deal to Ship Steller Stockpiles Through 2027

Krait Critical Minerals Signs Option for Historical Nevada King Antimony Mine

Related News

The Economy That Cried Wolf (Of Wall Street)

(title card concept stolen from Martin Scorsese and Jesse Hawken) This past March, when the...

Saturday, January 30, 2021, 08:30:00 AM

Gamblers Resort to Stock Trading as Means of Filling Empty Void

While almost the entire country went into lockdown mode as the government imposed stay-at-home orders,...

Sunday, May 24, 2020, 01:51:00 PM

Jim Cramer Suggests Wall Street Professionals Using Poor Performing Stocks To Bait Robinhood Traders

Jim Cramer, the host of CNBC’s Mad Money has provided some much-needed insight into the...

Sunday, June 14, 2020, 01:55:00 PM

Stock-Based Comp Paid By Growth Companies Is Ridiculously High – And Investors Have Paid Attention

Many growth companies choose to compensate their employees via a mixture of cash and newly...

Friday, December 2, 2022, 06:33:00 AM

Robinhood’s Preliminary Q2 Orderflow Revenues Suggests Retail Trading Mania May Be Wearing Off

After trading below its offering range since the debut day of its IPO, Robinhood (NASDAQ:...

Wednesday, August 4, 2021, 02:38:00 PM