Supreme Court Says Environmental Law Used to Delay Projects, Not Protect Environment

The US Supreme Court ruled in May that environmental review laws have been “stretched far beyond” their original intent and transformed into tools for delaying infrastructure projects, prompting calls from energy officials for federal agencies to streamline approvals.

Dan Brouillette, who served as Energy Secretary under President Donald Trump, argued in a piece published this week that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission should seize on the Supreme Court’s May ruling in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County to expedite infrastructure approvals.

The Supreme Court decision found that the National Environmental Policy Act had been “stretched far beyond” its original intent, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing that the law had become a tool to delay rather than properly assess environmental impacts.

Selkirk Copper Mines — sponsored Sponsored · Selkirk Copper Mines

Brouillette contends that environmental groups have weaponized NEPA reviews to block energy projects across all sectors, including fossil fuels, nuclear, wind, solar and battery storage, through lengthy litigation processes.

FERC currently maintains a minimum two-year review timeline for major environmental impact statements, which adds “tens of millions of dollars” to project costs regardless of complexity, according to Brouillette’s analysis.

Trump has nominated attorney Laura Swett to chair FERC. If confirmed, Swett would have the opportunity to implement the streamlined review processes that Brouillette advocates.

Brouillette recommends FERC establish expedited approval tracks for projects with minimal environmental impacts, utilize artificial intelligence to process environmental paperwork more efficiently, and dismiss what he terms “non-substantive protests” designed primarily to cause delays.

FERC oversees the interstate transmission of electricity, natural gas and oil, and has jurisdiction over hydroelectric projects and other energy infrastructure that crosses state lines.



Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

The Gold & Copper Stocks Everyone Keeps Asking About | Oct. 12-16 – Weekly Mining Mailbag

Similar Gold Mines Are Valued 10X Higher. Why Not This One? | JW Dumont – Granada Gold Mine

The US Interest Bill Gold Can’t Ignore | Peter Grandich

Recommended

Blue Jay Gold Signs Ocean Partners Deal to Ship Steller Stockpiles Through 2027

Krait Critical Minerals Signs Option for Historical Nevada King Antimony Mine

Related News