US Bailout of SVB Will Include Chinese Communist Party-Linked Depositors

The federal effort to make depositors of the collapsed Silicon Valley Bank whole will include deposits from businesses linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen confirmed at a Congressional hearing on Thursday.

Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, raised concerns over the American banking system taking on the responsibility for the exposure of these CCP-linked firms. 

“It has been reported publicly that SVB had a large number of Chinese investors that are there, including some companies that were directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party,” said Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma. “So what I’m asking is: will my banks in Oklahoma pay a special assessment to be able to make Chinese investors whole in Silicon Valley Bank?”

“Uninsured investors will be made whole in that bank and I suppose that could include foreign depositors, but I don’t believe there is any legal basis to discriminate among uninsured depositors,” Yellen confirmed.

The widespread panic that caused the SVB bank run raised alarms in China. Several Chinese startups rushed to calm investors, releasing statements to confirm ties with SVB and to clarify that exposure to the bank was minimal to zero.

SVB also has a 50-50 joint venture with Shanghai Pudong Development Bank called SPD Silicon Valley Bank, but the China-based bank has reassured its depositors that its balance sheet is independent from its US partner.

“The bank has a standardized corporate governance structure and an independent balance sheet,” it said in a statement. “As China’s first technology bank, SPD Silicon Valley Bank is committed to serving Chinese science and technology companies, and has always had sound operations in accordance with Chinese laws and regulations.”

When the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced the SVB bailout in a joint statement, they emphasized that the cost will not be borne by the taxpayer. But it will still be borne by consumers — however indirectly — as banks will likely pass on higher assessment fees via increased bank fees.


Information for this briefing was found via the National Review, Nikkei Asia, Twitter, and the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Higher Gold Prices Are Changing What Counts as a Real Discovery | Mike Bennett – Altamira Gold

Why Silver Still Hasn’t Seen the Real Mania | Craig Hemke

Why Copper Needs a Much Higher Price to Fix the Supply Problem | Greg Ferron – PTX Metals

Recommended

Goliath Resources Kicks Off Fully Funded 50,000 Metre Drill Program At Surebet

First Phosphate Lifts Bégin-Lamarche Indicated Tonnage by 378% In Latest Resource Update

Related News

Did This US Lawmaker Just Admit The CIA Is Monitoring China’s Crypto?

Representatives from the US Congress have been pushing the Creating Legal Accountability for Rogue Innovators...

Friday, November 10, 2023, 03:04:00 PM

Silicon Valley Bank Shut Down By California Regulator

It appears we’ve reached the end of the line for Silicon Valley Bank (NASDAQ: SIVB),...

Friday, March 10, 2023, 11:50:45 AM

What Happened at Silicon Valley Bank?

The FDIC insured bank could not meet withdrawal demands, was taken over by regulators Friday....

Saturday, March 11, 2023, 07:30:00 AM

Could Silicon Valley Bank’s Failure Impact the Production of California Wines?

As has been widely reported, the failure of SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ: SIVB) may have...

Monday, March 13, 2023, 06:24:00 AM

Banksplaining Part 2 – Capital Requirements

On the last episode, we learned about how a 3.4% move in interest rates caused...

Thursday, March 23, 2023, 03:28:00 PM