US Bailout of SVB Will Include Chinese Communist Party-Linked Depositors

The federal effort to make depositors of the collapsed Silicon Valley Bank whole will include deposits from businesses linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen confirmed at a Congressional hearing on Thursday.

Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, raised concerns over the American banking system taking on the responsibility for the exposure of these CCP-linked firms. 

“It has been reported publicly that SVB had a large number of Chinese investors that are there, including some companies that were directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party,” said Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma. “So what I’m asking is: will my banks in Oklahoma pay a special assessment to be able to make Chinese investors whole in Silicon Valley Bank?”

“Uninsured investors will be made whole in that bank and I suppose that could include foreign depositors, but I don’t believe there is any legal basis to discriminate among uninsured depositors,” Yellen confirmed.

The widespread panic that caused the SVB bank run raised alarms in China. Several Chinese startups rushed to calm investors, releasing statements to confirm ties with SVB and to clarify that exposure to the bank was minimal to zero.

SVB also has a 50-50 joint venture with Shanghai Pudong Development Bank called SPD Silicon Valley Bank, but the China-based bank has reassured its depositors that its balance sheet is independent from its US partner.

“The bank has a standardized corporate governance structure and an independent balance sheet,” it said in a statement. “As China’s first technology bank, SPD Silicon Valley Bank is committed to serving Chinese science and technology companies, and has always had sound operations in accordance with Chinese laws and regulations.”

When the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced the SVB bailout in a joint statement, they emphasized that the cost will not be borne by the taxpayer. But it will still be borne by consumers — however indirectly — as banks will likely pass on higher assessment fees via increased bank fees.


Information for this briefing was found via the National Review, Nikkei Asia, Twitter, and the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

First Majestic Q1 Earnings: A Bang Up Quarter

Copper’s Structural Shortage May Be Here to Stay | Colin Joudrie – Selkirk Copper

Why Barrick’s “Strong” Quarter Wasn’t So Strong | Q1 2026 Earnings

Recommended

Power Metallic Pushes Deeper Into Saudi Arabia With Amaar Mining Tie-Up

Canada Confirms First Hantavirus Case Linked to MV Hondius Cruise Ship Outbreak

Related News

Swedish Pension Fund Suffers Over $728M Loss After Selling Position in First Republic Bank

The steep drop in First Republic Bank (NYSE: FRC) shares Monday came as a surprise...

Wednesday, March 22, 2023, 06:18:00 AM

What Happened at Silicon Valley Bank?

The FDIC insured bank could not meet withdrawal demands, was taken over by regulators Friday....

Saturday, March 11, 2023, 07:30:00 AM

CSIS Report Now Claims Chinese Interference in Both Provincial And Federal Party Elections

In 2022, a senior Canadian politician vying for leadership within a provincial political party allegedly...

Saturday, December 2, 2023, 09:46:56 AM

U.S. Lawmakers to McKinsey: Cut China Ties or Lose Federal Contracts

Sens. Marco Rubio and Josh Hawley have intensified their calls for McKinsey & Company to...

Sunday, May 26, 2024, 11:23:00 AM

Banksplaining Part 2 – Capital Requirements

On the last episode, we learned about how a 3.4% move in interest rates caused...

Thursday, March 23, 2023, 03:28:00 PM