US Bailout of SVB Will Include Chinese Communist Party-Linked Depositors

The federal effort to make depositors of the collapsed Silicon Valley Bank whole will include deposits from businesses linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen confirmed at a Congressional hearing on Thursday.

Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma, raised concerns over the American banking system taking on the responsibility for the exposure of these CCP-linked firms. 

“It has been reported publicly that SVB had a large number of Chinese investors that are there, including some companies that were directly connected to the Chinese Communist Party,” said Senator James Lankford, a Republican from Oklahoma. “So what I’m asking is: will my banks in Oklahoma pay a special assessment to be able to make Chinese investors whole in Silicon Valley Bank?”

“Uninsured investors will be made whole in that bank and I suppose that could include foreign depositors, but I don’t believe there is any legal basis to discriminate among uninsured depositors,” Yellen confirmed.

The widespread panic that caused the SVB bank run raised alarms in China. Several Chinese startups rushed to calm investors, releasing statements to confirm ties with SVB and to clarify that exposure to the bank was minimal to zero.

SVB also has a 50-50 joint venture with Shanghai Pudong Development Bank called SPD Silicon Valley Bank, but the China-based bank has reassured its depositors that its balance sheet is independent from its US partner.

“The bank has a standardized corporate governance structure and an independent balance sheet,” it said in a statement. “As China’s first technology bank, SPD Silicon Valley Bank is committed to serving Chinese science and technology companies, and has always had sound operations in accordance with Chinese laws and regulations.”

When the Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) announced the SVB bailout in a joint statement, they emphasized that the cost will not be borne by the taxpayer. But it will still be borne by consumers — however indirectly — as banks will likely pass on higher assessment fees via increased bank fees.


Information for this briefing was found via the National Review, Nikkei Asia, Twitter, and the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

SSR Mining Walks Away From a World Class Gold-Copper Project

Why More Canadians Are Starting to Think About Leaving | Jesse Day

Instead of Waiting, This Gold Developer Went Bigger | Kenneth McLeod – Sonoro Gold

Recommended

Amid CBS Shuffle, Is Joe Rogan Replacing Anderson Cooper On 60 Minutes?

Silver47 Targets Resource Growth With 10,000 Metre Red Mountain Drill Program

Related News

Erin O’Toole Reveals He Was Targeted By China Before 2021 Election

Former Conservative leader Erin O’Toole has revealed that he was targeted by a misinformation and...

Thursday, June 1, 2023, 10:54:41 AM

Banksplaining: The Dive Draws About How Money Works (and doesn’t) Part 1: Reserve Ratios

This is the first in a series of the posts about the banking system as...

Saturday, March 18, 2023, 09:00:00 AM

David Sacks vs. Marc Cohodes, Explained

Amid all the chaos of leading banks capsizing into regulators hands, leaving depositors wary of...

Monday, March 20, 2023, 11:41:00 AM

Silicon Valley Bank Depositors To Be Made Whole While Signature Bank Also Shuttered

The US government has moved to protect depositors of Silicon Valley Bank (NASDAQ: SIVB) following...

Sunday, March 12, 2023, 06:57:36 PM

FBI Director Warns That Chinese Hackers Are Preparing To Cause ‘Real-World Harm’ To US Infrastructure

FBI Director Christopher Wray testified before the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party,...

Thursday, February 1, 2024, 01:05:00 PM