A Los Angeles County jury found Meta and YouTube negligent in the first social media addiction case to reach trial in the US, awarding $6 million in total damages to a 20-year-old California woman who alleged the platforms’ design features caused serious mental illness during her childhood.
The jury held Meta responsible for 70% of the harm and YouTube for 30%, splitting $3 million in compensatory damages and $3 million in punitive damages between the two companies.
Meta bears $4.2 million of the total award; YouTube owes $1.8 million. The jury also found the companies acted with “malice, oppression, or fraud,” the legal threshold required to impose punitive damages under California law.
The plaintiff — identified in court documents by the initials K.G.M. and referred to throughout the trial as Kaley — alleged that Instagram and YouTube’s recommendation algorithms, auto-play features, and notification systems hooked her as a minor and contributed to body dysmorphia, depression, and suicidal ideation. She reportedly began using YouTube at age 6 and Instagram at age 9.
Jurors deliberated more than 40 hours across nine days following a trial that included testimony from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram head Adam Mosseri. The verdict was not unanimous — California civil law required only 9 of 12 jurors to agree on each claim, and two consistently voted against liability.
Both companies said they plan to appeal.
“Teen mental health is profoundly complex and cannot be linked to a single app,” a Meta spokesperson said. “We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously as every case is different.” A Google spokesperson called the ruling a mischaracterization, saying it “misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site.”
The case serves as a bellwether for more than 1,600 similar lawsuits brought by families and school districts. Snap and TikTok settled with Kaley before the trial began.
A parallel federal proceeding, In re Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation, continues in the Northern District of California before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, with a federal trial involving school district claims scheduled for later this year.
Attorney Matt Bergman of the Social Media Victims Law Center said the verdict “establishes a framework for how similar cases across the country will be evaluated and demonstrates that juries are willing to hold technology companies accountable when the evidence shows foreseeable harm.”
Information for this story was found via the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.
