Saudi Arabia Slams Joe Biden’s Attempts To Delay OPEC+ Oil Output Cutback

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia issued a statement to clarify matters surrounding the OPEC+ decision to make its sharpest output cut since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The government’s foreign ministry reaffirmed that the organization of oil-exporting states made the decision to slash oil production should not be characterized as “taking sides in international conflicts” and “politically motived against the United States of America.”

“The Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would first like to express its total rejection of these statements that are not based on facts, and which are based on portraying the OPEC+ decision out of its purely economic context,” the kingdom said in its statement.

OPEC and its allies agreed last week in Vienna to proceed with cutting oil production by 2 million barrels per day come November, which amounts to about 2% of total global demand–the biggest cut it implemented since the pandemic.

The White House reportedly used all available resources to lobby the oil cartel ahead of their Vienna meeting, and is now left “having a spasm and panicking,” according to the people familiar with the matter. US President Joe Biden said he is “concerned” with OPEC’s decision, going as far as to call the move “a hostile act” and a “total disaster.”

But the Middle Eastern state–considered the de facto leader of the oil-exporting nations–countered this argument in its statement. The kingdom revealed that the Biden administration–through continuous consultation–has been asking to delay the planned oil output cut by a month.

However, OPEC+ seemingly thumbed down the request, citing the delay “would have had negative economic consequences.”

As to the allusions of taking sides in the global conflicts, the Kingdom reiterated that it will not change its “principled position” regarding the Russia-Ukraine war, “including its vote to support UN resolutions” related to the crisis.

OPEC, for its part, reminded Washington that the group is a “technical organization” rather than a political one, and won’t cater to Biden’s demands even if it means damaging relations with the US.


Information for this briefing was found via the sources mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to this organization. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why Gold’s Bull Run May Just Be Getting Started! | Peter Grandich

Tariffs Spark New Race for Critical Metals | Rob McEwen

Antimony Resources: The Bald Hill Project

Recommended

Tsunami Warnings Spread As Largest Quake Since 2011 Hits Russia

Northern Superior Intersects 1.75 g/t Gold Over 65.0 Metres At Philibert

Related News

Look, ‘Biden 2024’ Might Not Be Happening

Like his predecessor, US President Joe Biden might be looking at a one-term presidency. In...

Monday, September 19, 2022, 10:06:53 AM

Canada Rushes to Save Keystone XL Pipeline Before Biden Administration Cancels it

Top officials in the oil-producing provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan have called on the Trudeau...

Wednesday, January 20, 2021, 10:26:00 AM

Angola Leaves OPEC: “We Feel That We Currently Gain Nothing”

Angola has officially announced its decision to leave the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries...

Friday, December 22, 2023, 10:54:00 AM

Biden Wants to Make Air Travel Better for Consumers

President Joe Biden has announced that his administration is planning to create new rules that...

Tuesday, May 9, 2023, 10:10:00 AM

China Makes Historic Economic Partnership With Saudi Arabia

Chinese president Xi Jinping is making a landmark visit to the Middle East— the first...

Sunday, December 11, 2022, 06:27:00 PM