Twitter Backs Down from April 1 End Date of Legacy Verification, Removes the New York Times’ Gold Checkmark

In true Musk-ian fashion, Twitter seems to have postponed the announced removal of legacy verification for the accounts of politicians, celebrities, notable figures, and organizations. The system was originally designed to verify the authenticity of these accounts and protect against impersonation.

According to Twitter owner Elon Musk in a now-deleted Tweet, these legacy-verified accounts won’t lose their checkmarks for “a few more weeks.” But added that “unless they say they tell they won’t pay now, in which we will remove it.” 

This caveat was almost immediately applied to The New York Times’ main account after a user pointed out that the publication said it wouldn’t pay for a subscription — an ironic twist as The Times was also the first to report that according to internal documents, Twitter was planning to make legacy verification exemptions for the platform’s 10,000 most-followed organizations. 

Only the publication’s main account has been de-verified as of this writing.

In the interim however, legacy and Twitter Blue users have seemingly been lumped together by the platform.

To keep their checkmarks, individual accounts will need to pay $8 a month or $84 a year for a Twitter Blue subscription, while organizations will be charged $1,000 per month + $50 each for their affiliate accounts. 

Selkirk Copper Mines — sponsored Sponsored · Selkirk Copper Mines

Musk announced last week that beginning April 15 (but this may now also be subject to change), only verified accounts will be included in the platform’s ‘for you’ recommendations.

The exemptions that The Times saw would also reportedly include Twitter’s top 500 advertisers, a move that can be seen as an attempt by the company to claw back the 40% it has lost in advertising revenue.


Information for this briefing was found via Twitter, The New York Times, and the sources and companies mentioned. The author has no securities or affiliations related to the organizations discussed. Not a recommendation to buy or sell. Always do additional research and consult a professional before purchasing a security. The author holds no licenses.

Video Articles

Why Is This $1.5 Billion Gold Story Worth Just $37 Million? | Fredonia Mining PEA

This Copper Stock Exploded Before Anyone Knew the Grade | Decade Resource

Silver Miners Will Crush Gold Miners | Adrian Day

Recommended

Cambria Gold Reverses Course on Mt. Margaret Spinout, Citing Strong Copper Fundamentals

Krait Critical Minerals Closes Acquisition of Nevada Hills Antimony and Its Two Washington Projects

Related News

Did Elon Musk Steal the ‘Grok’ Name from Ex-Girlfriend Grimes?

Artist and musician Grimes has partnered with toy company Curio to introduce “Grok,” an interactive...

Friday, December 15, 2023, 02:11:00 PM

Texas Attorney General Launches Fraud Probe into Media Matters as Elon Musk Files ‘Thermonuclear’ Lawsuit

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched a fraud investigation into Media Matters for America...

Tuesday, November 21, 2023, 12:38:00 PM

Is Elon Musk Using Tesla Data to Help Sell xAI?

After previously claiming that the AI startup, xAI, is not raising funds, Elon Musk’s newest...

Monday, May 13, 2024, 11:38:00 AM

Twitter’s Role In The Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

The historic $42 billion bank run on Silicon Valley Bank was driven by a tweetstorm...

Tuesday, March 21, 2023, 04:42:00 PM

Why Trump and Musk Are Stirring Up Fort Knox Gold Drama

It may have something to do with the debt ceiling....
Monday, February 24, 2025, 04:28:00 PM